We introduce StratRAG, an open-source retrieval evaluation dataset for benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems on multi-hop reasoning tasks under realistic, noisy document-pool conditions. Derived from HotpotQA (distractor setting), StratRAG comprises 2,200 examples across three question types -- bridge, comparison, and yes-no -- each paired with a pool of 15 candidate documents containing exactly 2 gold documents and 13 topically related distractors. We benchmark three retrieval strategies -- BM25, dense retrieval (all-MiniLM-L6-v2), and hybrid fusion -- reporting Recall@k, MRR, and NDCG@5 on the validation set. Hybrid retrieval achieves the best overall performance (Recall@2 = 0.70, MRR = 0.93), yet bridge questions remain substantially harder (Recall@2 = 0.67), motivating future work on reinforcement-learning-based retrieval policies. StratRAG is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/Aryanp088/StratRAG.
Figures & tables
Statistic
Train
Validation
Total examples
2,000
200
Bridge questions
1,775
171
Comparison questions
112
17
Yes-no questions
113
12
Docs per pool
15
15
Gold docs per example
2
2
Table 1: StratRAG dataset statistics.
Retriever
R@1
R@2
R@5
MRR
NDCG@5
Random
0.0525
0.1425
0.3300
0.3190
0.2336
BM25
0.3950
0.6000
0.8150
0.8732
0.7624
Dense (MiniLM)
0.4175
0.6500
0.8600
0.9035
0.8087
Hybrid
0.4400
0.6975
0.9050
0.9310
0.8543
Table 2: Retrieval benchmark results on StratRAG validation set ( n=200 ). Best results in bold .
Type
n
R@2
MRR
NDCG@5
Bridge
171
0.6696
0.9281
0.8418
Yes-no
12
0.8333
0.9167
0.9007
Comparison
17
0.8824
0.9706
0.9473
Table 3: Hybrid retriever performance by question type on the StratRAG validation set.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) evaluation measures how well systems retrieve, use, and cite evidence while balancing reliability, cost, and speed.
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems that answer questions from document collections face compounding difficulties when high-precision citations are required: flat chunking strategies sacrifice document structure, single-query formulations miss relevant passages through vocabulary mismatch, and single-pass inference produces stochastic answers that vary in both content and citation selection. We present KohakuRAG, a hierarchical RAG framework that preserves document structure through a four-level tree representation (document → section → paragraph → sentence) with bottom-up embedding aggregation, improves retrieval coverage through an LLM-powered query planner with cross-query reranking, and stabilizes answers through ensemble inference with abstention-aware voting. We evaluate on the WattBot 2025 Challenge, a benchmark requiring systems to answer technical questions from 32 documents with ±0.1% numeric tolerance and exact source attribution. KohakuRAG achieves first place on both public and private leaderboards (final score 0.861), as the only team to maintain the top position across both evaluation partitions. Ablation studies reveal that prompt ordering (+80% relative), retry mechanisms (+69%), and ensemble voting with blank filtering (+1.2pp) each contribute substantially, while hierarchical dense retrieval alone matches hybrid sparse-dense approaches (BM25 adds only +3.1pp). We release KohakuRAG as open-source software at https://github.com/KohakuBlueleaf/KohakuRAG.
Shih-Ying Yeh, Yueh-Feng Ku, Ko-Wei Huang +1
National Tsing Hua University · Comfy Org Research · Kohaku-Lab
Recent advances in LLMs and the adoption of RAG systems in industry have created a need for domain-specific question-answer datasets that can assess RAG performance on proprietary data. Existing datasets, such as HotpotQA, challenge current RAG systems on Wikipedia-based knowledge, but they cannot be transferred directly to domain-specific settings. A comprehensive evaluation of RAG system quality requires both multi-hop queries and unanswerable questions. This paper introduces TRIAD, a three-stage automated dataset generation approach. First, it generates question--answer (QA) pairs for the domain-specific knowledge base of a RAG system. Second, a validator checks each QA-pair in a feedback loop. Third, the QA pairs are extended with relevance-labeled context documents for downstream evaluation. We evaluate this approach against the established MuSiQue and HotpotQA datasets. The results show that the generated dataset exhibits similar performance trends across different RAG setups, while human validation indicates that the questions are suitable for evaluating a domain-specific RAG system. The code used to generate the dataset and all validation results are available in our GitHub repository(https://github.com/lorenzbrehme/triad).
Lorenz Brehme, Adam Jatowt
University of Innsbruck Department of Computer Science Innsbruck, Austria
Multi-hop question answering (QA) requires reasoning across multiple documents, yet existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approaches address this either through graph-based methods requiring additional online processing or iterative multi-step reasoning. We present IndexRAG, a novel approach that shifts cross-document reasoning from online inference to offline indexing. IndexRAG identifies bridge entities shared across documents and generates bridging facts as independently retrievable units, requiring no additional training or fine-tuning. Experiments on three widely-used multi-hop QA benchmarks (HotpotQA, 2WikiMultiHopQA, MuSiQue) show that IndexRAG improves F1 over Naive RAG by 4.6 points on average, while requiring only single-pass retrieval and a single LLM call at inference time. When combined with IRCoT, IndexRAG achieves the best average performance among all evaluated methods, including graph-based baselines such as HippoRAG2 and FastGraphRAG, while relying on a flat vector index. Our code is available at https://github.com/Continuum-AI-Corp/IndexRAG .
Zhenghua Bao, Yi Shi
Continuum AI Shanghai, China · Continuum AI San Francisco, CA, USA