Majorization-Guided Test-Time Adaptation for Vision-Language Models under Modality-Specific Shift

Vision-language models (VLMs) such as CLIP exhibit remarkable zero-shot capabilities, yet their performance frequently degrades sharply under unexpected test-time distribution shifts. While Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) offers a promising solution, continuously adapting VLMs over an unlabeled test stream presents fundamental challenges. Conventional top-1-centric updates often reinforce errors by corrupting the local semantic geometry among related classes, while iterative adaptation exacerbates progressive bias accumulation, ultimately driving the model toward mode collapse. To overcome these coupled vulnerabilities, we propose Local Margin Restoration (LMR), a lightweight, one-step TTA framework. At the sample level, our Protected Margin Restoration (PMR) objective recovers local semantic geometry by shielding plausible near-top candidates from external hard negatives. Concurrently, to combat stream-level degradation, we introduce a dual-stage stabilization mechanism, featuring an Adaptive Margin (AM) controller and Bias Correction (BC), to dynamically disrupt progressive bias accumulation and prevent mode collapse. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-C, ImageNet-C, and ImageNet variants demonstrate that LMR consistently outperforms state-of-the-art TTA baselines, proving exceptionally robust and efficient even in challenging low-batch test-time regimes. Our code is available at https://github.com/DennisHuangYan/LMR.

Test-time adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a prominent strategy for adapting vision-language models to distribution shifts during inference. We conduct a per-sample analysis of model predictions before and after adaptation, and observe two failure modes in existing TTA methods that echo previous work. Adaptations are frequently negligible, yielding no change in the model's predictions, and more severely, they can be detrimental by flipping previously correct predictions to incorrect ones. This naturally raises a question: Can we identify and skip such negligible or harmful adaptations? In this work, we introduce a new problem of selective adaptation, which aims to determine whether a given test sample should undergo adaptation or be skipped. To this end, we propose Cross-Augmentation Similarity (CAS), a simple baseline that performs adaptation only when predictions across augmented views exhibit low similarity. Notably, CAS not only preserves but in some cases improves overall accuracy, even when skipping nearly 85% of the adaptation process. We hope other researchers will explore this new direction and surpass the performance of our baseline. Our code is available at https://github.com/sirujiang/selective-adaptation.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) achieve strong cross-modal performance, yet recent evidence suggests they over-rely on textual descriptions while under-utilizing visual evidence -- a phenomenon termed ``text shortcut learning.'' We propose an adversarial evaluation framework that quantifies this cross-modal dependency by measuring accuracy degradation (Drop) when semantically conflicting text is paired with unchanged images. Four adversarial strategies -- shape_swap, color_swap, position_swap, and random_text -- are applied to a controlled geometric-shapes dataset ($n{=}1{,}000$). We compare three configurations: Baseline CLIP (ViT-B/32), LoRA fine-tuning, and LoRA Optimized (integrating Hard Negative Mining, Label Smoothing, layer-wise learning rates, Cosine Restarts, curriculum learning, and data augmentation). The optimized model reduces average Drop from 27.5% to 9.8% (64.4% relative improvement, $p{<}0.001$) while maintaining 97% normal accuracy. Attention visualization and embedding-space analysis confirm that the optimized model attends more to visual features and achieves tighter cross-modal alignment.