SpecRLBench: A Benchmark for Generalization in Specification-Guided Reinforcement Learning

This work presents a logic-driven framework to evaluate the performance of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in their ability to generalize to unseen tasks. Our framework defines a family of inductive reach-avoid tasks, characterized by structural similarities in task dynamics, enabling evaluation of generalization capabilities. We introduce a neural certificate function that validates trajectories generated by RL algorithms by enforcing key conditions, thereby serving as a litmus test for RL generalization. We empirically demonstrate our method's capability in certifying generalization for several state-of-the-art generalizable RL algorithms on challenging continuous environments. Our results show that a lower percentage of certificate function violations correlates with a higher number of test tasks successfully solved, highlighting the effectiveness of our framework in evaluating and distinguishing generalization capabilities of RL algorithms. This work provides a principled approach for benchmarking RL generalization.

We present a novel end-to-end model-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm for efficient policy synthesis under given Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) specifications (e.g., safety or reachability) in unknown environments. To do so, a Limit-Deterministic B{ü}chi Automaton (LDBA) representation of the LTL task is synchronised with a Bayes-Adaptive Markov Decision Process (BAMDP) representation of the environment, which allows us to leverage an enhanced exploration-exploitation trade-off that is achieved via Bayesian RL, as opposed to traditional non-Bayesian approaches. We further propose a novel Bayes-Adaptive Monte-Carlo Planning (BAMCP) algorithm to allow for approximate Bayes-optimal strategy synthesis in the synchronised BAMDP construct. A range of finite- and infinite-horizon task experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in terms of both property satisfaction and sample efficiency, when compared to traditional model-free approaches. Additional ablation studies also successfully highlight the value of the novel BAMCP algorithm in comparison to classical BAMCP for LTL task satisfaction. Finally, we also showcase a successful application of our approach for \textit{cautious} RL, namely to reduce the number of task violations incurred during policy training.

Motivated by the challenge presented by non-Markovian objectives in reinforcement learning (RL), we present a novel framework to track and represent the progress of autonomous agents through complex, multi-stage tasks. Given a specification in finite linear temporal logic (LTL), the framework establishes a 'tracking vector' which updates at each time step in a trajectory rollout. The values of the vector represent the status of the specification as the trajectory develops, assigning true, false, or 'open' labels (where 'open' is used for indeterminate cases). Applied to an LTL formula tree, the tracking vector can be used to encode detailed information about how a task is executed over a trajectory, providing a potential tool for new performance metrics, diverse exploration, and reward shaping. In this paper, we formally present the framework and algorithm, collectively named Live LTL Progress Tracking, give a simple working example, and demonstrate avenues for its integration into RL models. Future work will apply the framework to problems such as task-space exploration and diverse solution-finding in RL.