math.DGApr 27, 2026

PINNs in More General Geometry

Authors: Edward Hirst

Organizations: Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Computação Científica (IMECC), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), 13083-859, Brazil

Abstract

Neural architectures trained with losses inspired by differential conditions are the basis for PINN models. Since many constructions in differential geometry may be framed as minimisation of a differential functional, these functionals can be coded as loss functions to align the AI loss-minimisation goal with that of solving the geometric problem. This contribution to the Recent Progress in Computational String Geometry workshop proceedings introduces the PINN architecture defining principles, motivates how they are well suited for problems in differential geometry, and demonstrates their use via summaries of three works at this intersection.

Explore similar work

Jul 30, 2026math.DG

A user's guide to PINNs in geometric analysis: lessons from the asymptotic Plateau problem

This proceedings contribution elaborates on the findings of arXiv:2605.26234v2: a joint work with Marco Usula, where we introduced a machine learning framework based on physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), aimed at constructing near-minimal discs in hyperbolic space asymptotic to a prescribed knot at infinity. We used this method to provide numerical evidence for a conjecture of Joel Fine relating minimal surfaces in H4H^{4} to the coefficients of the HOMFLY polynomial. This is a methodological companion to that paper, based on a presentation given at the 2026 edition of the workshop "DANGER: Data, Numbers, and Geometry". Rather than reviewing the results, which are presented extensively in the preprint above, we discuss the two aspects of the framework which, in our experience, determined whether the method worked at all. First, the geometry of the problem must be encoded in the architecture of the model, so that the boundary condition and asymptotics at infinity hold exactly for every value of the learnable parameters - leaving us with a single-component loss function; second, the evaluation of the PDE residual must be engineered with care to ensure that complete trainings can be performed in a reasonable time. On the latter point, we describe two implementation techniques which are not spelled out in detail in the original paper: replacing nested reverse-mode automatic differentiation with the forward propagation of second-order jets, and compiling the computational graph of the residual once instead of rebuilding it at every optimisation step. Together, on identical hardware, these two changes reduce the cost of a training step by a factor of roughly forty to fifty. We hope these methodological discussions can be useful for researchers in differential geometry and geometric analysis who wish to deploy PINNs on problems of their own.
Tancredi Schettini Gherardini
May 15, 2026cs.LG

When and Why Adversarial Training Improves PINNs: A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspective

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are powerful surrogates for differential equations but are notoriously difficult to train due to spectral bias, stiffness, and poor accuracy on high-frequency or multiscale solutions. Adversarial training based on generative adversarial networks (GANs) has recently gained surprisingly strong empirical results in improving training, but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. To this end, we propose a new analysis framework for adversarially trained PINNs, based on the key observation of how the discriminator in GANs can influence the training dynamics of PINNs. The framework first provides a much needed theoretical grounding to why and when adversarial training is effective in PINNs, then presents a unified analysis of GANs variants in such training, and finally leads to a new, practical, efficient training algorithm for PINNs. Empirical results demonstrate that our method can significantly reduce the pathology of PINNs training, thereby providing better models with superior performances, often several magnitudes more accurate than alternative methods.
Yuan-dong Cao, Chi Chiu SO, Jun-Min Wang +1
May 29, 2026cs.LG

PINNs Failure Modes are Overfitting

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a common class of machine learning-based partial differential equation (PDE) solvers which train a network to represent a solution by minimizing a residual loss that encodes the PDE. Despite their successes, they are known to fail on certain simple equations, converging to an incorrect solution despite low loss. These failure modes have garnered significant attention in the literature over the past several years, motivating both architectural and optimization based solutions. By directly visualizing the residual, we show that failure modes are the result of overfitting: the loss is minimized on the collocation points, but not elsewhere. Applying regularization causes the failure modes to vanish. Finally, we extend double backpropagation over the full set of residuals, and use it to achieve state-of-the-art performance on four standard failure mode equations with up to 23×23\times fewer collocation points and a vanilla architecture.
Nigel T. Andersen, Takashi Matsubara