PSP: An Interpretable Per-Dimension Accent Benchmark for Indic Text-to-Speech

Venkata Pushpak Teja Menta

cs.SDApr 28, 2026

PSP: An Interpretable Per-Dimension Accent Benchmark for Indic Text-to-Speech

Authors: Venkata Pushpak Teja Menta

Organizations: Praxel Ventures

Abstract

Standard text-to-speech (TTS) evaluation measures intelligibility (WER, CER) and overall naturalness (MOS, UTMOS) but does not quantify accent. A synthesiser may score well on all four yet sound non-native on features that are phonemic in the target language. For Indic languages, these features include retroflex articulation, aspiration, vowel length, and the Tamil retroflex approximant (letter zha). We present PSP, the Phoneme Substitution Profile, an interpretable, per-phonological-dimension accent benchmark for Indic TTS. PSP decomposes accent into six complementary dimensions: retroflex collapse rate (RR), aspiration fidelity (AF), vowel-length fidelity (LF), Tamil-zha fidelity (ZF), Frechet Audio Distance (FAD), and prosodic signature divergence (PSD). The first four are measured via forced alignment plus native-speaker-centroid acoustic probes over Wav2Vec2-XLS-R layer-9 embeddings; the latter two are corpus-level distributional distances. In this v1 we benchmark four commercial and open-source systems (ElevenLabs v3, Cartesia Sonic-3, Sarvam Bulbul, Indic Parler-TTS) on Hindi, Telugu, and Tamil pilot sets, with a fifth system (Praxy Voice) included on all three languages, plus an R5->R6 case study on Telugu. Three findings: (i) retroflex collapse grows monotonically with phonological difficulty Hindi < Telugu < Tamil (~1%, ~40%, ~68%); (ii) PSP ordering diverges from WER ordering -- commercial WER-leaders do not uniformly lead on retroflex or prosodic fidelity; (iii) no single system is Pareto-optimal across all six dimensions. We release native reference centroids (500 clips per language), 1000-clip embeddings for FAD, 500-clip prosodic feature matrices for PSD, 300-utterance golden sets per language, scoring code under MIT, and centroids under CC-BY. Formal MOS-correlation is deferred to v2; v1 reports five internal-consistency signals plus a native-audio sanity check.

Explore similar work

Jun 24, 2026eess.AS

CrossAccent-TTS: Cross-Lingual Accent-Intensity Controllable Text-to-Speech via Disentangled Speaker and Accent Representations

Accent conversion and controllability remain fundamental challenges in cross-lingual text-to-speech (TTS), particularly for low-resource and phonetically diverse Indic languages. While recent large language model (LLM)-based TTS systems exhibit strong cross-lingual generalization, they provide limited explicit control over accent characteristics and intensity. In this paper, we propose CrossAccentTTS, a framework that enables both accent control and conversion while preserving speaker identity. Specifically, we introduce an Accent Intensity Controller (AIC) that injects weighted language embeddings into the accent subspace, allowing smooth interpolation between accents and fine-grained modulation of accent strength at inference time. Experiments on the Indic Multilingual and L2-arctic datasets shows that CrossAccent-TTS achieves precise control of accent intensity, outperforming strong baselines in accent similarity and controllability by maintaining speaker similarity and naturalness.

Ram Annamdevula, Ankit Tatawat, Ashishkumar P. Gudmalwar +2

Accented Speech Zero-Shot Text-To-Speech Multilingual Automatic Speech Recognition Speaker Identity Semantic Similarity Metrics

Ask PDF

May 26, 2026cs.CL

PashtoTTS-Bench: automated screening for low-resource non-Latin-script text-to-speech

Text-to-speech (TTS) evaluation for low-resource non-Latin-script languages can fail when it relies on a single ASR round-trip word error rate (WER). A system may produce no audio, speak a neighbouring language, preserve target script text only in an ASR transcript, or sound unnatural to native listeners. We introduce INSV (Intelligibility, Naturalness, Script fidelity, and Verification), a reporting framework that separates these cases. This paper reports INSV-A, the automated screening subset: synthesis completion, ASR WER/CER, transcript Script Fidelity Rate, and audio language identification. Native MOS and phonetic annotation are specified but not claimed in this release. We instantiate INSV-A as PashtoTTS-Bench, a dated benchmark for Pashto TTS. The April-May 2026 run evaluates Edge GulNawaz, Edge Latifa, OmniVoice clone, OmniVoice auto, and an Urdu negative control on 200 FLEURS and 200 filtered Common Voice 24 prompts. Under the independent omniASR_CTC_300M_v2, OmniVoice auto has the lowest WER (24.1% FLEURS, 27.4% CV24), followed by Edge GulNawaz (32.8%, 39.5%), Edge Latifa (35.6%, 47.7%), and OmniVoice clone (45.4%, 34.8%). WER below the natural-speech baseline reflects clean synthetic audio and should not be read as better than native speech. Whisper Large V3 returns 0.0% Pashto labels on checked Pashto TTS audio, while MMS-LID-4017 and SpeechBrain VoxLingua107 separate Pashto outputs from the Urdu control. The release provides provider metadata, per-sentence scores, LID audits, failure logs, and scripts for adding systems.

Hanif Rahman

Zero-Shot Text-To-Speech Low-Resource Languages Transcription Screening

Ask PDF

Aug 10, 2026cs.SD

Beyond Naturalness: Probing Automated Text-To-Speech Evaluators on Linguistically Grounded Dimensions

Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Models (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive. We deconstruct "naturalness" into a linguistically grounded annotation schema spanning 10 distinct perceptual dimensions, and use it to construct the first dimension-level meta-evaluation benchmark for TTS, comprising 860 utterances annotated by trained linguist raters. Results from benchmarking four MOS predictors and four Audio-LLM judges reveal that MOS predictors collapse onto acoustic signal quality, while Audio-LLM judges show selective, prompt-dependent detection that does not generalise across all dimensions. Neither class reliably captures a breadth of linguistically structured speech errors. Our dataset, annotation schema, and evaluation code are publicly released to support more targeted and interpretable TTS evaluation.

Oluwanifemi Bamgbose, Simon Rosen, Jash Shah +6

Zero-Shot Text-To-Speech Large Audio Language Models Linguistics Mean Opinion Scores

Ask PDF