Safe Navigation using Neural Radiance Fields via Reachable Sets

Safe navigation of autonomous robots remains one of the core challenges in the field, especially in dynamic and uncertain environments. One prevalent approach is safety filtering based on control barrier functions (CBFs), which are easy to deploy but difficult to design. Motivated by the shortcomings of existing learning- and model-based methods, we propose a simple yet effective neural CBF design method for safe robot navigation in dynamic environments. We employ the idea of a composite CBF, where multiple neural CBFs are combined into a single CBF. Individual CBFs are trained using data generated offline via the Hamilton-Jacobi reachability framework to approximate the optimal safe set for single moving obstacles. Additionally, we use a residual neural architecture, ensuring that the estimated safe set does not intersect with the corresponding failure set. The method is extensively evaluated in simulation experiments for a ground robot and a quadrotor, comparing it against several baseline methods. The proposed method improves success rates by up to 18% over the strongest baseline, while maintaining comparable or lower path lengths and motion times. The method is also demonstrated in hardware experiments for both types of robots.

Safe navigation for mobile robots demands policies that remain reliable under the high-consequence perception uncertainty of cluttered environments. Yet most existing safe reinforcement learning (RL) methods assess safety through average cumulative cost. Such metrics can mask dangerous tail-risk behaviors. To address this, we propose a framework that trains risk-sensitive policies through Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) constrained optimization on an off-policy TD3 backbone and evaluates their safety margins post-training through neural network reachability verification. During training, the policy is optimized under CVaR constraints on cumulative costs, promoting sensitivity to high-cost tail outcomes rather than average behavior alone. After training, we compute action reachable sets under bounded observation uncertainty using Taylor Model analysis, yielding a safety rate metric that quantifies the proportion of evaluated states at which the policy's reachable action set remains within prescribed safety margins. A key finding is that policies trained with CVaR constraints maintain larger safety margins from obstacles across evaluated states. This makes them significantly more amenable to formal reachability verification. Experiments across ten navigation scenarios and six baselines show that our method achieves a 98.3% success rate, the highest safety verification rate among all compared methods, while revealing that average cost rankings and reachability-based safety rankings can diverge. This indicates that reachability verification captures risks which are missed by empirical cost metrics alone. We further validate our approach on a physical Clearpath Jackal robot, demonstrating successful sim-to-real transfer.

Vision-based navigation models, particularly foundation models, generate viable trajectories from RGB observations alone. However, even state-of-the-art transformer- and diffusion-based policies struggle to generalize in unfamiliar deployment environments containing unseen obstacles or shifted conditions. The resulting trajectories often remain goal-directed but unsafe. Existing efforts improve safety through external trajectory correction or internal geometric priors, yet the resulting policies are not trained to explicitly represent obstacle boundaries or traversable free-space structure. To address this, we propose a navigation model that incorporates these structures directly into the policy via fine-tuning and is designed to be compatible with diverse RGB-based backbones. Across multiple robot platforms, indoor environments, and static and dynamic obstacle scenarios, our method reduces collision frequency relative to ViNT, NoMaD, and their CARE-augmented variants while maintaining goal-reaching performance.