Multibit neural inference in a N-ary crossbar architecture

Using Resistive Random Access Memory (RRAM) crossbars in Computing-in-Memory (CIM) architectures offers a promising solution to overcome the von Neumann bottleneck. Due to non-idealities like cell variability, RRAM crossbars are often operated in binary mode, utilizing only two states: Low Resistive State (LRS) and High Resistive State (HRS). Binary Neural Networks (BNNs) and Ternary Neural Networks (TNNs) are well-suited for this hardware due to their efficient mapping. Existing software projects for RRAM-based CIM typically focus on only one aspect: compilation, simulation, or Design Space Exploration (DSE). Moreover, they often rely on classical 8 bit quantization. To address these limitations, we introduce CIM-Explorer, a modular toolkit for optimizing BNN and TNN inference on RRAM crossbars. CIM-Explorer includes an end-to-end compiler stack, multiple mapping options, and simulators, enabling a DSE flow for accuracy estimation across different crossbar parameters and mappings. CIM-Explorer can accompany the entire design process, from early accuracy estimation for specific crossbar parameters, to selecting an appropriate mapping, and compiling BNNs and TNNs for a finalized crossbar chip. In DSE case studies, we demonstrate the expected accuracy for various mappings and crossbar parameters. CIM-Explorer can be found on GitHub.

Building on resistive communication, this paper presents a physics-based design of an on-chip neural network with multi-level memristive synapses supporting a dense spectrum of conductance states. Derived from ionic transport physics, we develop a state-variable model and quantify storable sub-levels under thermal noise, drift, and quantized conductance. We assemble these devices into a 1T1R crossbar fabric, derive the linear algebra of analog vector-matrix multiplication (VMM) under wire resistance, and design a differential synapse for signed weights. A multilayer pipeline executes inference, backpropagation, and weight updates physically in the analog domain. We derive the in-situ outer-product learning rule, its discretization onto the conductance lattice, and the resulting quantization noise. We provide energy, area, capacity, and inter-tile models, showing this substrate is ideally suited for large language models (LLMs). Our design eliminates weight movement, surpassing binary ReRAM and traditional CMOS. We detail the material stack (HfO_2-based), the FEOL/BEOL CMOS foundry-integration flow, a self-contained SPICE model, the complete memristive-FPGA neuromorphic system, and an in-memory self-attention engine with current-mode translinear softmax. Finally, a ternary BitNet datapath shows projected per-token efficiency orders of magnitude better than advanced CPUs or GPUs. The result is a self-contained hardware-native blueprint for a high-density, analog, in-memory neural processor.

Analog in-memory computing (AIMC) speeds up neural-network inference by doing the arithmetic directly inside a memory array, instead of shuttling weights back and forth between memory and a processor. This saves energy, but the physical devices that store the weights are imperfect: programming errors, electrical noise, limited-resolution converters, and outright broken cells all distort the computation, and every physical chip is distorted in its own way. A designer with several such chips available faces an uncomfortable choice: run all of them and combine the answers (safe, but wasteful of energy), or trust a single chip blindly (cheap, but with no guarantee on how often it is wrong). This paper introduces RACE-AIMC (Risk-Aware Certified Ensemble for AIMC), a framework that resolves this choice with statistics rather than guesswork. Offline, RACE-AIMC studies a pool of physical accelerators, picks the single best one for a given energy budget, and computes a mathematically exact upper bound on how often that accelerator will be wrong when it chooses to answer. Online, only that one accelerator is switched on; a lightweight check decides whether to accept its answer or defer to a fallback. In our simulations using a noisy weight mapping and multiple independent test runs, every certified bound stayed under a 10% error target (mean bound 7.83% +- 0.89%, with 70.88% +- 0.98% of inputs answered directly). The resulting system matches the accuracy of a clean digital baseline while cutting modeled energy use by 69.02% relative to always running every accelerator in the pool.