cs.LGApr 29, 2026

Learning Rate Transfer in Normalized Transformers

Authors: Boris ShigidaBoris HaninAndrey Gromov

Organizations: Meta Superintelligence Labs · Princeton University

Abstract

The Normalized Transformer, or nGPT (arXiv:2410.01131) achieves impressive training speedups and does not require weight decay or learning rate warmup. However, despite having hyperparameters that explicitly scale with model size, we observe that nGPT does not exhibit learning rate transfer across model dimension and token horizon. To rectify this, we combine numerical experiments with a principled use of alignment exponents (arXiv:2407.05872) to revisit and modify the μμP approach to hyperparameter transfer (arXiv:2011.14522). The result is a novel nGPT parameterization we call ννGPT. Through extensive empirical validation, we find ννGPT exhibits learning rate transfer across width, depth, and token horizon.

Explore similar work

Aug 2, 2026cs.LG

Training nGPT

The normalized Transformer (nGPT) realizes hyperspherical representation learning by constraining model parameter vectors and activation vectors to the unit hypersphere. In this paper, we describe a practical training recipe for nGPT and evaluate it on modern hybrid Mamba-2--Transformer Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. The recipe introduces Logit Gradient Preconditioning, Logarithmic Learning Rate Decay, GatedAdamW, angular update control, and optional exploration mechanisms. Compared with an unnormalized model of the same hybrid MoE architecture trained with AdamW, the 30B-total-parameter nGPT model reaches the same validation loss using approximately half as many training tokens. The recipe scales across the models considered, which contain up to 30B total parameters.
Ilya Loshchilov, Boris Ginsburg
May 20, 2026cs.LG

Quantifying Hyperparameter Transfer and the Importance of Embedding Layer Learning Rate

Hyperparameter transfer allows extrapolating optimal optimization hyperparameters from small to large scales, making it critical for training large language models (LLMs). This is done either by fitting a scaling law to the hyperparameters or by a judicious choice of parameterization, such as Maximal Update (μμP), that renders optimal hyperparameters approximately scale invariant. In this paper, we first develop a framework to quantify hyperparameter transfer through three metrics: (1) the quality of the scaling law fit, (2) the robustness to extrapolation errors, and (3) the asymptotic loss penalty due to choice of parameterization. Next, we investigate through a comprehensive series of ablations why μμP appears to offer high-quality learning rate transfer relative to standard parameterization (SP), as existing theory is inadequate. We find that the overwhelming benefit of μμP relative to SP when training with AdamW arises simply from maximizing the learning rate of the embedding layer. In SP, the embedding layer learning rate acts as a bottleneck that induces training instabilities; increasing it by a factor of width to match μμP dramatically smooths out training while improving hyperparameter transfer. We also find that weight decay improves the scaling law fits, while, in the fixed token-per-parameter setting, it hurts the robustness of the extrapolation.
Dayal Singh Kalra, Maissam Barkeshli
Jun 28, 2026cs.LG

On the Nonlinearity of Learning Rate Scaling for LLM Training

Learning-rate transfer can reduce the cost of training large language models: instead of sweeping learning rates at target scale, practitioners extrapolate from smaller runs. Existing approaches often assume that the optimal learning rate follows a log-linear scaling law in data scale and model size. We carefully examine and evaluate this scaling law. In our empirical study of GPT-2--style models from 22M to 707M parameters trained on 5B to 100B tokens, the optimal learning rate develops upward curvature at larger scales, leading to inaccurate extrapolation. We find that this curvature largely disappears when learning rates are replaced by effective learning rate (the step size in normalized weight space), and when data DD extrapolation is used instead of model size NN extrapolation. Next, we explain nonlinearity in scaling: weight-norm converges to equilibrium slower when optimal learning is small, requiring a larger step size to reduce the transient phase. Experiments with AdamH, which directly controls the effective learning rate, further support this explanation.
Zaiwen Yang, Huaqing Zhang, Jing Xu +1