cs.LGApr 29, 2026

Analytical Correction for Subsampling Bias in Drifting Models

Authors: Jiaru ZhangZeyun DengJuanwu LuZiran WangRuqi Zhang

Organizations: Purdue University

Abstract

Drifting models are capable one-step generative models trained to follow a drifting field. The field combines attractive and repulsive softmax-weighted centroids over the data and current-generator distributions. In practice, only a minibatch of nn samples from each distribution is available, and each centroid is approximated by an empirical estimate. In this paper, we begin by showing that the minibatch centroid is in general a biased estimator of the target centroid, with a pointwise O(1/n)O(1/n) bias arising from softmax self-normalization. Correcting this bias requires the expectation over the full distribution, which is intractable. We instead approximate the leading bias term from in-batch statistics and propose Analytical Bias Correction (ABC), a closed-form plug-in adjustment. We prove that ABC reduces the bias from O(1/n)O(1/n) to O(1/n2)O(1/n^2), introduces no first-order increase in total variance, and preserves convex-hull containment of the corrected centroid. In practice, ABC requires only two additional lines of code and has negligible wall-time overhead under compiled execution. Toy experiments confirm the theoretical O(1/n)O(1/n) and O(1/n2)O(1/n^2) scaling. On CIFAR-10, ABC reduces FID and trains faster, with the largest gains at small nn, where the bias is most significant.

Explore similar work

Aug 8, 2026cs.LG

Second Order Drifting Models

Drifting models are a recent class of one-step generative models that evolve the model distribution during training using a predefined sample-based drift field. Although they avoid iterative inference, their kernel-based drift fields induce frequency-dependent training dynamics: In the linearized regime, each Fourier mode of the density residual decays at a rate determined by the kernel spectrum, leading to slow recovery of fine-scale structure. We propose Second-Order Drifting Models, which lift drifting dynamics into phase space by augmenting generated samples with artificial velocity variables. We show that the resulting density perturbations obey accelerated second-order dynamics in Fourier space, connecting drifting models to the celebrated Nesterov acceleration from optimization theory. This provides a principled mechanism for mitigating the spectral stiffness of first-order drifting while preserving one-step inference. We derive a practical semi-implicit training algorithm and evaluate it on synthetic distribution matching, sequential data generation, and robotic control. Across these settings, the second-order drifting model improves convergence behavior and achieves competitive or superior performance over first-order drifting baselines.
Drake Brown, Yuhao Huang, Shih-Hsin Wang +1
May 12, 2026cs.LG

DriftXpress: Faster Drifting Models via Projected RKHS Fields

Drifting Models have emerged as a new paradigm for one-step generative modeling, achieving strong image quality without iterative inference. The premise is to replace the iterative denoising process in diffusion models with a single evaluation of a generator. However, this creates a different trade-off: drifting reduces inference cost by moving much of the computation into training. We introduce DriftXpress, an accelerated formulation of drifting models based on projected RKHS fields. DriftXpress approximates the drifting kernel in a low-rank feature space. This preserves the attraction-repulsion structure of the original drifting field while reducing the cost of field evaluation. Across image-generation benchmarks, DriftXpress achieves comparable FID to standard drifting while reducing wall-clock training cost. These results show that the training-inference trade-off of drifting models can be pushed further without giving up their one-step inference advantage.
Ali Falahati, Elliot Creager, Gautam Kamath +1
Sep 14, 2026cs.LG

Convergence rates for generative drifting flows: fixed-scale obstructions and multihead acceleration

Drifting models offer a promising route to faster generative AI: they perform gradual transport during training, while generating new samples in a single step. This paper asks whether the underlying drifting process can converge rapidly to a target distribution under ideal conditions, before finite-data or optimization effects are introduced. We show that its convergence rate depends critically on how it handles spatial scale. With a single fixed resolution, fine-scale features of the target can become nearly invisible, leading to extremely slow convergence. We introduce a multihead approach that combines scale-normalized information across a continuum of resolutions. We prove that this multihead approach restores exponential convergence near standard reference distributions. These results identify fixed resolution as a key bottleneck and provide a simple route to faster one-step generative models.
Arthur Stéphanovitch, Eddie Aamari