The TEA Nets framework combines AI and cognitive network science to model targets, events and actors in text

Sebastiano Franchini; Alexis Carrillo; Edoardo Sebastiano De Duro; Riccardo Improta; Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili; Massimo Stella

cs.AIApr 30, 2026

The TEA Nets framework combines AI and cognitive network science to model targets, events and actors in text

Authors: Sebastiano Franchini, Alexis Carrillo, Edoardo Sebastiano De Duro, Riccardo Improta, Ali Aghazadeh Ardebili, Massimo Stella

Organizations: 1*CogNosco Lab, Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Trento, Italy.

Abstract

We introduce Target-Event-Agent Networks (TEA Nets) as a computational framework to extract subjects (Agents"), verbs (Events"), and objects (Targets") from texts. Grounded in cognitive network science and artificial intelligence, TEA Nets are implemented as an open-source Python library. We test TEA Nets in three case studies, demonstrating the framework's ability to perform interpretable emotion detection, semantic frame analyses, and linguistic inquiries across conspiracy texts and textual responses generated by LLMs. In the LOCO conspiracy corpus, TEA Nets revealed that highly conspiratorial narratives (4,227 texts) linked personal pronouns (I", you", we") with the same actions twice as frequently as low-similarity conspiracy narratives. High-conspiracy narratives connected person-focused elements (you", people") through actions eliciting anger above the random baseline ( $z = 2.63, p < .05$ ), a trend absent in low-similarity conspiracy narratives, which emphasized scientific actors (researcher", scientist"). In the HOPE and CounseLLMe datasets of 212 (human) and 200 (LLM-based) psychotherapy transcripts, respectively, TEA Nets highlighted emotional differences. When expressing feelings, Claude 3 Haiku, GPT-3.5, and humans used sad words with higher frequency than random expectations but Haiku expressed sadness with lower emotional intensity than humans ( $U = 1243.5, p = .036$ ). We discuss these differences in the context of psychotherapy training on LLM-simulated patients. Our results show that Target-Event-Agent Networks can extract relevant emotional, syntactic, and semantic insights from narratives, opening new avenues for text analysis with cognitive network science.

Explore similar work

Jul 13, 2026cs.CL

Fine-Tuned Multi-Agent Framework for Detecting OCEAN in Life Narratives

Accurately assessing personality from text is challenging because traits are latent, context-dependent, and often subtly expressed across long narratives. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities by processing extensive textual contexts, but pretraining of these models can induce latent "personality-like" biases, making single-model inferences inconsistent. We propose a fine-tuned multi-agent framework for detecting OCEAN personality traits, in which sub-agents are conditioned to adopt high, low, or neutral perspectives for each trait through masked language modeling (MLM) and psychometric supervision. A judge LLM aggregates and compares sub-agent outputs to generate final trait predictions, capturing multiple complementary perspectives while mitigating individual model biases. We evaluate the framework on life narrative dataset through quantitative and qualitative experiments, including baselines, ablations, and inference quality analyses. Our approach offers a scalable and interpretable method for text-based personality inference, highlighting the benefits of multi-agent reasoning grounded in psychometric supervision.

Rasiq Hussain, Darshil Italiya, Joshua Oltmanns +1

Personality Implicit Bias Ocean

Ask PDF

Jul 22, 2026cs.CL

Sympathetic Framing: Evaluating AI Alignment across Sociodemographic Groups

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly shaping how we consume information and form our worldview. This raises concerns beyond bias in AI: do LLMs grasp the emotional nuances conveyed via textual framing? In this work, we empirically evaluate how well an array of LLMs aligns with human emotional perception. Considering news headlines covering political and geopolitical conflicts, both human participants (n = 3011, a representative sample of the U.K. adult population, via a YouGov survey) and seven LLMs answered whether headlines evoked sympathy for a specified side in a conflict. We find that the correlation between AI and human evaluations varies across models, ranging from very high (0.789, GPT-5.2) to medium (0.4 ,Mistral Large 2512). Crucially, the leading models are broadly aligned with human judgments across all demographic subgroups, including age, gender, level of education, prior geopolitical knowledge, and participants' predispositions regarding the conflict, although there are statistically significant differences between groups. This research, with its robust design and large, demographically diverse dataset, offers the most comprehensive evaluation of LLMs' comprehension of news framing to date. Findings highlight an important, often-ignored aspect of differential alignment: even when aggregate performance is high, AI alignment is not universal -- it may correspond differently with demographic features and cultural norms. Considering or ignoring the need for differential alignment may therefore have significant implications for the development of ethical and useful AI systems.

Haran Shani-Narkiss, Michael Fire, Oren Tsur

Large Language Model Bias Artificial Intelligence Alignment Task Framing Large Language Model Evaluation Demographics Geopolitical Sphere

Ask PDF

Jun 4, 2026cs.SI

Comparing Sentiment Contagion in AI-Agent and Human Social Networks: Evidence from MOLTBOOK

AI agents are beginning to interact not only with people, but also with one another. We investigate what happens to sentiment in such an AI-only social network: does negativity spread, or do replies calm it down? We study MOLTBOOK, a social network made up of autonomous language-model agents, using almost 2.9 million posts and 1.5 million comments. Negative posts receive many more replies than neutral or positive posts, so negativity still attracts attention. However, replies to negative content usually do not stay negative. They most often become neutral, and there is meager evidence that negative sentiment spreads across days. The main pattern is therefore not a cycle of negativity, but negative attention followed by neutralisation. These findings suggest that AI-agent networks may behave differently from human social networks: they may dampen emotional extremes, while still depending strongly on how interactions are organised.

Elyes Ben chaabane, Savindu Herath, Yash Raj Shrestha

Social Media Artificial Intelligence Agents

Ask PDF