Organizations: NTT, Inc. · Nara Institute of Science and Technology
Abstract
The hubness problem, in which hub embeddings are close to many unrelated examples, occurs often in high-dimensional embedding spaces and may pose a practical threat for purposes such as information retrieval and automatic evaluation metrics. In particular, since cross-modal similarity between text and images cannot be calculated by direct comparisons, such as string matching, cross-modal encoders that project different modalities into a shared space are helpful for various cross-modal applications, and thus, the existence of hubs may pose practical threats. To reveal the vulnerabilities of cross-modal encoders, we propose a method for identifying the hub embedding and its corresponding hub text. Experiments on image captioning evaluation in MSCOCO and nocaps along with image-to-text retrieval tasks in MSCOCO and Flickr30k showed that our method can identify a single hub text that unreasonably achieves comparable or higher similarity scores than human-written reference captions in many images, thereby revealing the vulnerabilities in cross-modal encoders.
Vision-language models map images and text into a joint embedding space. However, these embeddings often entangle multiple semantic features, which limits their interpretability and controllability. While sparse autoencoders have emerged as a useful tool for decomposing these embeddings into monosemantic features, their application to joint embedding spaces has largely relied on an implicit, untested assumption that semantically corresponding features share the same directions across modalities. In this paper, we challenge this assumption by identifying discrepancies in feature directions for the same concept across image and text modalities, a phenomenon we term cross-modal feature heterogeneity. We demonstrate that this heterogeneity is a key driver of the modality split, where a shared concept activates different latents depending on the modality. This finding further reveals why aligning latent activations alone is insufficient to resolve the underlying feature mismatch. Motivated by this observation, we propose an approach that trains modality-specific sparse autoencoders to preserve each modality's feature geometry, and then aligns corresponding features post hoc. Our method improves reconstruction fidelity and enhances performance in cross-modal retrieval and concept steering.
Reducing the modality gap between image and text representations in CLIP is widely expected to improve cross-modal alignment and downstream performance. However, a smaller average image-text gap does not necessarily lead to consistent accuracy gains. We analyze this mismatch from the perspective of the decision structure in zero-shot classification, i.e. selecting the most similar class-text prototype for an input image. Zero-shot accuracy depends not only on average image--text alignment, but also on class-wise decision margins. Using Linear correction as an analytically tractable case, we show that modality gap correction can alter the relative decision structure among classes and cause predictions to concentrate on a small subset of classes. We refer to this output-space failure mode as prediction-level hubness. Furthermore, experiments across multiple datasets show that accuracy degradation under gap correction is consistently associated with increased prediction concentration, both for Linear correction and for learning-based correction methods. This provides a systematic explanation of why modality gap reduction does not consistently improve CLIP zero-shot accuracy from the perspective of downstream decision structure. Our results suggest that gap correction should be evaluated not only by average alignment, but also by its impact on downstream prediction structure.
Multimodal representation learning seeks shared representations for cross-modal retrieval and knowledge transfer. Hub-based binding reduces pairwise supervision costs, but separate hub connections cannot guarantee reliable alignment between modalities without direct joint training. We introduce Hub-Spectral Activation (HSA), a closed-form method for recovering and activating the hub-readable component of latent multimodal knowledge in frozen representations. We formalize this knowledge as source-induced cross-modal dependence and characterize the component determined by the second-order statistics of two trained hub edges. Under a second-order source model, we establish conditions for exact recovery of the complete source-induced relation and bound the dimension of its hub-readable component by the hub covariance rank. HSA composes and standardizes hub-edge statistics, extracts paired spectral directions, and combines reliability-weighted matching evidence with source-gated candidate resolution for bidirectional retrieval and prototype classification. HSA requires no target-pair supervision, gradient optimization, or backbone updates. Across 19 retrieval and 11 prototype-classification relations on ImageBind and LanguageBind, HSA raises mean bidirectional Recall@10 from 18.27% to 31.15% and mean macro Top-1 accuracy from 29.01% to 52.43%, respectively. Controlled analyses further identify valid hub-edge correspondence and leading spectral directions as key sources of retrieval gains, demonstrating the utility of latent multimodal knowledge beyond native similarity scores. Code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/Luo1Yan/HSA.