Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies often fail under distribution shift, suggesting that decisions may depend on spurious visual correlations rather than task-relevant causes. We formulate visual-action attribution as an interventional estimation problem. Accordingly, we introduce the Interventional Significance Score (ISS), an interventional masking procedure for estimating the causal influence of visual regions on action predictions, and the Nuisance Mass Ratio (NMR), a scalar measure of attribution to task-irrelevant features. We analyze the statistical properties of ISS and show that it admits unbiased estimation, and we characterize conditions under which action prediction error provides a valid proxy for causal influence. Experiments across diverse manipulation tasks indicate that NMR predicts generalization behavior and that ISS yields more faithful explanations than existing interpretability methods. These results suggest that interventional attribution provides a simple diagnostic approach for identifying causal misalignment in embodied policies.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies perform robot manipulation tasks using multimodal inputs such as visual observations, proprioceptive states, and language instructions. However, it remains unclear at which execution stages each modality contributes to final task success and how input interventions propagate through subsequent states, observations, and actions. Existing attribution approaches primarily measure local sensitivity or temporally aggregated importance, limiting their ability to capture phase-dependent contributions and cross-phase dependencies. We propose Interaction-aware Multimodal Propagation Attribution via Counterfactual Trajectories for Vision-Language-Action Policies (IMPACT-VLA). IMPACT-VLA constructs behavioral phases from action transitions in a successful reference rollout, aligns them with policy query boundaries, and defines phase-modality blocks as attribution units. It then performs closed-loop counterfactual re-execution to quantify each block's contribution to final task success. We further analyze cross-phase non-additive interactions and trajectory propagation while distinguishing behavioral from functional recovery. Across 30 LIBERO robot manipulation tasks using OpenVLA-OFT, dominant-modality transitions occurred in 25 tasks (83.3%), and closed-loop attribution identified task-critical information more faithfully than Static Action Perturbation. Later-block marginal gains for negatively interacting pairs increased by approximately 3.3x under early-phase input replacement, while functional recovery could occur without behavioral recovery. These results reveal when multimodal inputs support task success and how their contributions become conditionally coupled during closed-loop execution.
Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) have shown remarkable progress towards embodied intelligence. While their architecture partially resembles that of Large Language Models (LLMs), VLAs exhibit higher complexity due to their multi-modal inputs/outputs and often hybrid nature of transformer and diffusion heads. This is part of the reason why insights from mechanistic interpretability in LLMs, which explain how the internal model representations relate to their output behavior, do not trivially transfer to VLA counterparts. In this work, we investigate whether VLA internal representations support lightweight behavioral steering without retraining. Across four frontier VLA models, linear \emph{observers} recover state- and action-relevant information in both autoregressive and transformer--flow-matching architectures, and provide robust directions to causally alter VLA outputs. Building on this, we introduce a \emph{controller} that minimally modifies representations to place observer predictions within prescribed target intervals. Closed-loop experiments with π0.5 in the LIBERO simulator and on DROID hardware demonstrate improved constraint satisfaction while retaining task performance, with only approximately 1% inference overhead. Together, these experiments show that lightweight linear interventions can reliably steer VLA behavior while preserving closed-loop capabilities, enabling alignment with user preferences and task requirements without fine-tuning.
Hugo Buurmeijer, Carmen Amo Alonso, Aiden Swann +1
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) policies translate language and visual inputs into robot actions, where their hidden representations directly shape closed-loop behavior. However, mechanistic interpretability tools from language and vision-language models do not transfer cleanly to VLAs: outputs are robot actions rather than human-readable tokens, and interventions can only be tested via expensive closed-loop rollouts. We propose an event-grounded interpretability pipeline that anchors SAE feature analysis to behavioral events rather than text contexts. End-effector keyframes are clustered within each task using visual, state, and temporal cues, linking SAE features to behaviorally salient events and, via optional VLM annotations, to semantic context. To our knowledge, our pipeline is among the first to ground SAE-based VLA analysis in closed-loop behavioral events. Across two simulation architectures and a real-robot study, event-grounded ranking yields the strongest causal effects on OpenVLA and transfers to the continuous action chunks of π0.5. SAE is a sparse but imperfect intervention basis: usability varies with architecture and intervention site, and aggressive intervention reveals safety and interpretability limits. Overall, event-grounded SAE analysis emerges as a practical starting point for behavior-anchored VLA interpretability, motivating future work on SAE features beyond action-aligned coordinates, finer-grained closed-loop evaluation, and safe interventions for high-stakes VLA deployments. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/xc-j/Event-SAE}.