cs.LGMay 1, 2026

Affinity Is Not Enough: Recovering the Free Energy Principle in Mixture-of-Experts

Authors: Man Yung Wong

Organizations: Russell · Independent Researcher

Abstract

Sparse MoE routing fails at domain transitions, where the current token belongs to one distribution and the next to another. In a controlled experiment (4 experts, 5 seeds), standard affinity routing assigns only 0.006 +/- 0.001 probability to the correct expert at the transition. Three lightweight gate modifications raise this to 0.748 +/- 0.002 (124x), cutting experts needed for 99% coverage from infeasible to a small constant: temporal memory (beta), a per-expert LIF membrane potential accumulating routing context across tokens; precision-weighted gating (Pi), a per-expert inverse variance of recent prediction error, yielding 31x contrast between reliable and unreliable experts; and anticipatory routing, a next-state predictor conditioned on the beta-accumulated hidden state. The mechanisms draw from Friston's Free Energy Principle and use LIF dynamics from spiking neural networks. An ablation across all 2^3 subsets reveals a super-additive beta x Ant interaction: anticipation alone gives nothing (+0.000 +/- 0.001); beta alone gives modest gain (+0.295 +/- 0.013); combined they close 75% of the oracle gap (+0.741 +/- 0.002, exceeding the sum by +0.446 +/- 0.014). This is structural: a stateless predictor cannot detect approaching transitions because pre-transition tokens are distributionally identical to within-domain tokens. In a character-level MoE LM (5 seeds), beta-routing reduces transition-step BPC from 6.56 +/- 0.01 (Standard) to 4.01 +/- 0.15 (beta-MoE); the beta + Ant gate places 0.86 +/- 0.02 probability on the correct domain expert before that domain appears in input, vs 0.42 +/- 0.12 for Standard MoE. Reference implementations (~200 lines each): https://github.com/russellwmy/affinity-is-not-enough

Explore similar work

CardsList
May 8, 2026cs.LG

When Are Experts Misrouted? Counterfactual Routing Analysis in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models route each token to a small subset of experts, but whether the routes selected by a trained top-kk router are good ones is rarely evaluated directly. Holding the model fixed, we compare each standard route against sampled equal-compute alternatives for the same token and score each by the next-token probability it assigns to the realized token in a verified reasoning trajectory. The result is sharply token-conditional: the standard router is well-aligned with route utility on confident tokens but uninformative on the fragile tokens that drive hard reasoning, where lower-loss equal-compute routes consistently exist inside the frozen model but are not selected. The same pattern holds across Qwen3-30B-A3B, GPT-OSS-20B, DeepSeek-V2-Lite, and OLMoE-1B-7B, and follows structurally from how standard top-kk training evaluates routing decisions: the language modeling loss scores only the executed route, and load balancing depends only on aggregate routing statistics. A minimal router-only update to the final-layer router, leaving every expert and every other router frozen, is sufficient to shift pass@K on AIME 2024+2025 and HMMT 2025 for both Qwen3-30B-A3B and GPT-OSS-20B, suggesting that at least part of the failure reflects router-reachable misallocation rather than expert capacity alone.
Youngsik Yoon, Siwei Wang, Wei Chen +1
Mixture-of-Experts ModelsExpertsDeepseekLoss Function
AskPDF
Jul 30, 2026cs.LG

Beyond Geometric Complementarity: Coherent Overlap in Sparse Mixture-of-Experts Routing

Sparse mixture-of-experts (MoE) language models route each token to multiple experts, suggesting a geometric account of their benefit: co-selected experts should contribute distinct representation directions. Existing evidence often conflates route coherence, candidate quality, and candidate-by-context interaction. We distinguish these quantities using an Expert Subspace Separation Index (ESSI), matched-route residuals, and a prefix-controlled 2×22\times2 factorial; frozen-route interventions and a controlled Top-kk study assess functional value. Three paired contrasts organize the findings. First, across six MoE architectures, expert subspaces overlap substantially, yet actual routes explain token representations better than matched alternatives. Second, across the 39 factorial cells in OLMoE, Mixtral, and DeepSeek, the selected candidate explains more of the residual representation than the strongest unselected rival in every cell, yet the actual prefix narrows this advantage throughout: all interactions are negative, and every 95% confidence interval lies below zero. Third, this geometric narrowing does not imply functional redundancy: adding later experts improves next-token prediction in 24 of 39 frozen-route comparisons, while the other 15 estimates are inconclusive; a controlled training study also favors Top-2 over Top-1 in all three seeds. We call this joint pattern coherent overlap: routing selects token-relevant experts from a shared geometric neighborhood, while useful multi-expert computation persists without disjoint linear coverage. Separating these quantities clarifies why geometric similarity alone cannot determine redundancy or pruning value.
Huiyuan Tian, Bonan Xu, Shijian Li
Mixture-of-Experts ModelsCoherence
AskPDF
Jun 1, 2026cs.LG

ProbMoE: Differentiable Probabilistic Routing for Mixture-of-Experts

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models scale by activating only a small subset of experts per token. However, training such models remains challenging because top-kk routing is discrete and non-differentiable, requiring gradient estimators for expert selection whose design remains a central open problem. We introduce ProbMoE, a probabilistic routing framework that models expert selection as a distribution over cardinality-constrained expert subsets and formulates routing as probabilistic inference in this discrete subset space. We first propose ProbMoE Exact-kk routing, which samples kk-expert subsets in the forward pass, and the backward pass uses gradients through each expert's exact marginal probability as a tractable surrogate for the true gradient. ProbMoE naturally generalizes to a dynamic-kk routing setting, where both training and inference constrain the routing cardinality to the same predefined range, allowing adaptive expert allocation per token. Across benchmarks and model backbones, ProbMoE Exact-kk achieves strong performance compared to competitive baselines, with improved expert utilization and routing diversity; ProbMoE Dynamic-kk achieves comparable performance with fewer activated experts.
Heng Zhao, Zilei Shao, Guy Van den Broeck +1
Probabilistic InferenceCardinality
AskPDF