DIAGRAMS: A Review Framework for Reasoning-Level Attribution in Diagram QA

Diagram question answering (DQA) requires models to interpret structured visual representations such as charts, maps, infographics, circuit schematics, and scientific diagrams. Recent vision-language models (VLMs) often achieve high answer accuracy on these tasks, yet correct answers do not guarantee that models ground their reasoning in the diagram regions that support the prediction. Models may instead rely on textual correlations or dataset artifacts without identifying the visual evidence required to verify the answer. This limitation prevents reliable evaluation of diagram reasoning and reduces interpretability. We introduce DRAGON, a benchmark for evaluating evidence-grounded visual reasoning in diagrams. Given a diagram, a question, and the correct answer, a model must predict bounding boxes that correspond to the visual elements required to justify the answer. These evidence regions may include answer-bearing components, textual labels, legends, axes, connectors, and other supporting structures involved in the reasoning process. The DRAGON dataset contains 11,664 annotated question instances collected from six diagram QA datasets: ChartQA, Circuit-VQA, InfographicsVQA, MapIQ, MapWise, and AI2D. We release a 2,445-instance benchmark test set with human-verified reasoning evidence annotations and a standardized evaluation framework. We evaluate eight recent VLMs and analyze their ability to localize reasoning evidence across diverse diagram domains. DRAGON enables systematic evaluation of diagram reasoning and supports future research on models that ground their predictions in visual evidence.

Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in visual question answering with natural images. However, they continue to struggle with scientific diagrams, which are designed to convey functional or relational meaning rather than literal scenes. We therefore introduce a framework for generating large-scale diagram-grounded instruction data by leveraging terminology derived from scientific curricula. Our approach systematically extracts domain concepts, synthesizes atomic facts, retrieves relevant diagrams from the web, and generates multimodal supervision in the form of diagram captions and multiple-choice questions. Using this pipeline, we construct SciGram, a dataset of over 194K diagrams and 1.4M visual instructions across life, earth, and physical sciences. Despite relying on noisy web data and synthetic annotations, models fine-tuned on SciGram achieve substantial improvements on diagram-centric benchmarks, including TQA, ScienceQA, and AI2D, outperforming or matching state-of-the-art VLMs while using fewer training instances. Furthermore, augmenting existing models such as LLaVA OneVision with SciGram establishes new state-of-the-art performance on diagram question answering. Our results highlight the effectiveness of terminology-grounded instruction generation as a general strategy for improving vision-language reasoning in scientific domains. To support future research in scientific diagram understanding, we release both the SciGram dataset and models.

System-level diagrams encode the architectural blueprint of chip design, specifying module functions, dataflows, and interface protocols. However, non-standardized symbols and the scarcity of structured training data hinder existing multimodal large language models (MLLMs) from recognizing these diagrams. To address this gap, we introduce DiagramNet, the first multimodal dataset for system-level diagrams, comprising 10,977 connection annotations and 15,515 chain-of-thought QA pairs across four tasks: Listing, Localization, Connection, and Circuit QA. Building on this dataset, we propose a progressive training pipeline together with a decoupled multi-agent workflow that decomposes complex visual reasoning into Perception, Reasoning, and Knowledge stages. On the DiagramNet benchmark, integrating our 3B-parameter model with the proposed workflow surpasses the 2025 EDA Elite Challenge winner and outperforms GPT-5, Claude-Sonnet-4, and Gemini-2.5-Pro by over 2x in end-to-end evaluation. Notably, the workflow generalizes beyond our model, boosting Task 1 performance by 128.7x for Gemini-2.5-Pro and 12.4x for GPT-5. Furthermore, with only 60 images for detector adaptation, the method transfers effectively to AMSBench, achieving zero-shot connectivity reasoning on par with GPT-5 and Claude-Sonnet-4 while surpassing the AMS state-of-the-art method Netlistify.