Energy-Based Constraint Networks: Learning Structural Coherence Across Modalities

Deepfake detection systems achieve near-perfect accuracy on benchmarks, yet forensic deployment demands reliable prediction uncertainty. Existing uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods rely on single sources and ignore that optimal uncertainty composition varies across architectures. We propose Correlation-Optimized Fusion (COF), an architecture-adaptive framework that fuses five complementary uncertainty sources -- epistemic, aleatoric, calibration, conformal, and distributional -- by maximizing Pearson correlation between fused uncertainty scores and prediction errors via constrained optimization on the probability simplex. COF requires no model modifications and only 42 s of weight optimization, compared to 20--45 h for a 5-model Deep Ensemble. Evaluation across eleven architectures on FaceForensics++ reveals a fundamental trade-off: under matched train/evaluation protocol, non-linear methods achieve approximately 5--6% higher in-domain correlation than COF (mean r = 0.438), but this reverses under distribution shift. On CelebDF, COF outperforms Random Forest in 9/11 architectures with up to 7.3x higher correlation (MaxViT-B: r = 0.249 vs. 0.034); RF degrades 85% cross-domain to r = 0.071, whereas COF retains substantially more signal (74% drop to r = 0.116). Cross-dataset evaluation on CelebDF and DFDC reveals catastrophic generalization failure across all methods: in-domain correlations of 0.41--0.47 collapse to near-zero externally (mean degradation 90.7%), with seven of eleven architectures exhibiting uncertainty inversion. These results establish COF as a practical, interpretable framework for controlled-distribution deployment and identify domain-adaptive UQ as the central open challenge for forensic deployment.

Localizing document tampering is extremely challenging, as manipulations are crafted to appear visually consistent and often leave only subtle traces that are nearly invisible to the human eye. In prior work, evaluation has been largely dominated by synthetic benchmarks that closely match the training distribution, and methods have shown steady progress under this setting. However, these gains often translate poorly to human-made forgeries and to cross-domain evaluation, where both the source documents and the tampering pipeline can change, leading to a distribution shift. In addition, since the introduction of the Frequency Perception Head for the discrete cosine transform (DCT) modality, it has become a standard choice, and subsequent work has largely focused on downstream modules and fusion strategies rather than revisiting the backbone itself. To help close this gap in cross-domain performance and improve the DCT backbone design, we propose \textbf{DiffNet}, a relatively simple yet effective RGB--DCT early-fusion architecture driven by two key design choices. First, to ensure that the decoder aggregates multi-scale inconsistency evidence rather than operating on raw, content-heavy activations, we apply a lightweight multi-level discrepancy transformation at the output of each backbone stage, replacing features with magnitude-only responses to learned zero-sum filters. Second, we design an efficient DCT-domain backbone that relies on a lightweight frequency-index-aware DCT--quantization joint embedding. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance on cross-domain and human-made document tampering localization, outperforming prior methods by around 30%, with up to $7\times$ higher throughput than the previous best model.

Forensic deepfake analysis demands more than binary classification: investigators need region-grounded natural language explanations they can verify against the image. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are a natural fit, but pretrained MLLMs fail systematically, producing globally coherent text that misses the small localized cues defining manipulations. We argue this is an inductive bias problem rather than a capacity issue: the image-text contrastive objective training MLLM visual encoders optimizes for whole-image semantic summaries, not patch-level forensic detail. The same mismatch explains why prior deepfake reasoning methods target either face manipulation or fully AI-generated content, never both. We propose FORGE, which addresses the mismatch by routing a second visual stream into the language model from a Vision-Only Model (VOM) trained on dense patch prediction rather than image-text alignment. The MLLM's native encoder and the VOM operate on a shared patch grid, which lets us interleave their tokens with preserved spatial correspondence; we show this beats naive concatenation. A two-stage adapter training protocol (generic image-caption alignment, then joint task-specific optimization) prevents the localized stream from overfitting to training-domain manipulations. Across face-manipulated and fully synthetic content, FORGE produces region-referential explanations answering fine-grained attribute queries ("Does the eyes/nose/mouth look real or fake?") and substantially outperforms in-domain baselines on cross-domain evaluations; region-specific evaluation and human studies confirm explanation faithfulness.