ECG-biometrics-bench: A Unified Framework for Reproducible Benchmarking of ECG Biometrics

Electrocardiogram (ECG)-based biometric recognition has emerged as a promising solution for secure authentication and liveness detection. However, most existing methods rely on unimodal deep learning architectures that independently process either one-dimensional (1D) temporal signals or two-dimensional (2D) time-frequency representations, limiting robustness and generalization. To address this issue, this paper proposes a hybrid framework integrating 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks (CNNs) within a unified end-to-end architecture. The 1D branch extracts temporal and morphological features from raw ECG signals, while the 2D branch captures discriminative spectral information from time-frequency representations. An attention-guided fusion mechanism dynamically weights both modalities according to input characteristics, overcoming the limitations of conventional static fusion strategies. The framework was evaluated on three benchmark datasets (ECG-ID, MIT-BIH, and PTB), including healthy subjects and patients with cardiac pathologies, achieving identification accuracies of 99.56%, 100.00%, and 99.89%, respectively. To assess long-term biometric permanence, experiments were also conducted on the multi-session Heartprint dataset spanning ten years. The proposed approach achieved same-session accuracies of 98.54% (S1), 99.09% (S2), 94.93% (S3R), and 96.08% (S3L), while cross-session evaluations reached 56.33% (S1-S2) and 53.27% (S2-S3R), demonstrating the ability to capture stable biometric signatures over time. The optimal configuration combines InceptionTime for 1D processing, ResNet-34 for 2D analysis, and attention-based fusion. Ablation studies confirm that the proposed attention mechanism consistently outperforms conventional fusion approaches. Overall, the proposed framework provides a robust, scalable, and high-performance solution for ECG biometric recognition.

Existing benchmarks for electrocardiogram foundation models primarily evaluate downstream predictive performance, providing limited insight into whether their internal representations can be faithfully decomposed, clinically interpreted, or reproduced across independent analyses. We introduce ECG-InterpBench, a benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the interpretability of ECG foundation-model representations. ECG-InterpBench uses sparse autoencoders as standardized measurement instruments and matches their capacity across models to enable controlled comparisons. We evaluate six frozen ECG foundation models across five standardized encoder depths, five matched dictionary widths, and three random seeds, producing a 450-cell interpretability atlas comprising 75 exactly matched six-model comparison blocks. The benchmark evaluates complementary dimensions of representation interpretability, including sparse reconstruction fidelity, single-feature accessibility and coverage of 49 clinically meaningful ECG measurements, and cross-seed feature reproducibility. The evaluation further quantifies patient-sampling uncertainty, depth- and seed-dependent variation, and sensitivity to the sparsity parameterization. The benchmark reveals that ECG foundation models exhibit distinct interpretability profiles. A matched replication on MIMIC-IV-ECG confirms that reconstruction fidelity and clinical accessibility identify different leading models. The benchmark is accompanied by executable evaluation code, standardized manifests, cell-level metrics, and reproducibility audits. ECG-InterpBench complements performance-centered ECG benchmarks by providing a capacity-controlled and reproducible framework for comparing ECG foundation models across distinct dimensions of representation interpretability.

Deep learning has led to numerous proposed architectures for Automated Emotion Recognition (AER) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data, but inconsistencies in preprocessing, training, and evaluation make direct comparisons difficult. Most studies train and validate models on individual datasets collected under homogeneous conditions, limiting variability and raising concerns about generalizability. Cross-dataset validation is sometimes used but primarily assesses model adaptability rather than true generalization. This study presents a comparative analysis of prominent deep learning architectures in AER, emphasizing model generalization over dataset adaptability. To enable this benchmark, we introduce two open-source frameworks: Affective Research on Representations and Classifications (ARRC), a standardized benchmarking toolkit, and Affective Research Dataset Toolkit (ARDT), a framework for inter-dataset training and validation. Using ARDT, we consolidate three publicly available AER datasets, CUADS, ASCERTAIN, and DREAMER, into a single dataset, increasing variability in sensor types, recording conditions, and participant demographics. We then use ARRC to evaluate three widely studied deep learning models and two CNN baselines through hyperparameter optimization and 10-fold cross-validation. Our findings provide insights into the trade-offs between classification accuracy and model complexity, establishing a reproducible benchmark for AER research. All source code for ARRC, ARDT, and model evaluation is publicly available to ensure transparency and facilitate further research.