mdok-style at SemEval-2026 Task 10: Finetuning LLMs for Conspiracy Detection

Multi-domain detection of the machine-generated code snippets in various programming languages is a challenging task. SemEval-2026 Task~13 copes with this challenge in various angles, as a binary detection problem as well as attribution of the source. Specifically, its subtasks also cover generator LLM family detection, as well as a hybrid code co-generated by humans and machines, or adversarially modified codes hiding its origin. Our submitted systems adjusted the existing mdok approach (focused on machine-generated text detection) to these specific kinds of problems by exploring various base models, more suitable for code understanding. The results indicate that the submitted systems are competitive in all three subtasks. However, the margins from the top-performing systems are significant, and thus further improvements are possible.

We present our systems for SemEval-2026 Task 10 (PsyCoMark), addressing conspiracy marker extraction (Subtask 1) and document-level conspiracy detection (Subtask 2). For marker extraction, we formulate the task as multi-label span classification over enumerated candidate spans, using IoU >= 0.95 positive labeling, hard-negative sampling, and containment-based non-maximum suppression (NMS) with boundary-aware span representations. Document classification is modeled independently using a sequence classifier with label smoothing and a stratified train-validation split. Analysis shows that entity-like roles (Actor, Victim) are detected robustly, while abstract roles (Action, Effect, Evidence) remain sensitive to boundary criteria. On the official test set, our systems rank 7th in Subtask 1 (0.2251 macro F1) and 11th in Subtask 2 (0.7694 weighted F1).

This paper describes the system submitted by team \textbf{Archaeology} to SemEval-2026 Task~13 on AI-generated code detection. The shared task consists of three subtasks; we participate in Subtask-A (binary classification: human-written vs.\ AI-generated code) and Subtask-B (11-class attribution of the generating model). Starting from a TF-IDF and Logistic Regression baseline, we fine-tune four pre-trained code models (CodeBERT, GraphCodeBERT, UniXcoder, and CodeT5+) with separate strategies for each subtask. For Subtask-A, we use leave-one-language-out cross-validation, code augmentation, chunked inference with trimmed-mean aggregation, and threshold calibration on a difficult dataset. For Subtask-B, we use sandwich token packing, class-balanced loss, and multi-seed ensembling with test-time augmentation. Our best submissions obtain macro-F1 scores of 0.737 on Subtask-A (6th/81 teams) and 0.422 on Subtask-B (7th/34 teams).