Human languages expand vocabularies by combining existing morphemes rather than inventing arbitrary forms. Communicative efficiency shapes lexical systems at multiple levels (Gibson et al., 2019), yet morphological composition -- combining morphemes through compounding or affixation -- has rarely been modeled as a historically situated speaker choice among competing morpheme sequences, leaving unanswered why a language settles on one morpheme combination over other plausible alternatives. We ask whether a trade-off between listener recoverability and speaker production cost can predict attested compositions over contemporaneously available alternatives. Here we show, within the Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework (Frank & Goodman, 2012; Goodman & Frank, 2016) using a time-indexed lexicon constructed from Corpus of Historical American English (COHA) and Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), that across 4323 naturally occurring English compounds and derivations spanning 1820--2019, attested compositions are systematically ranked above unattested alternatives generated from contemporaneously available morphemes. Models integrating semantic informativeness with production cost outperform semantic-only and cost-only baselines on Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR) and top-k accuracy (Acc@k), with the advantage of the Pragmatic Speaker model (S1) over the semantic-only baseline growing as the candidate set expands, where meaning alone leaves morphological choice underdetermined. These findings suggest that lexicalization reflects a communicative trade-off between expressiveness and efficiency, extending rational accounts of communication from utterance-level choice to the internal structure of words.
We explore the phenomenon of semantic change of German and English noun compounds, with the objective of investigating and modeling gradual changes of meanings and degrees of compositionality in the past and over time. To do so, we introduce the Compositionality Trend Prediction task, which is evaluated against a novel dataset of in-context compositionality ratings sampled across several decades of diachronic corpora for 23 German and 26 English target compounds, uniquely providing per-decade ratings and corresponding trends over time. These per-decade compositionality ratings allow us to investigate empirically untested hypotheses of generalized trends in compositionality over time, such as the idea that compounds should become less compositional (less transparent) over time. Beyond our empirical observations from the diachronic compositionality annotations, we perform experiments with semantic vector representations of varying complexity, as well as several temporal granularities for training these representations on diachronic data, resulting in about 100 models of each representation type, each covering a different 1--5 decade slice of a diachronic corpus. Contrary to the decisive tendency posited in the literature, we find only a small negative trend in compositionality over time in our target compounds. In our computational experiments, we find that using models trained on narrow time slices of diachronic data (single decades, or incrementally expanding temporal windows) align better with the per-decade compositionality ratings than those trained on an entire half-century window, the latter setting being an analog for the prevalent modeling approach of training representations on an entire half of a corpus' data. Additionally, we find static representations to be competitive with contextual representations in the Compositionality Trend Prediction task.
Chris Jenkins, Emma Raimundo Schulz, Filip Miletić +1
Communicating using only a limited vocabulary is a common but challenging cognitive phenomenon, requiring an ideal communicator to plan carefully to optimize for intelligibility while circumventing a constrained lexicon. In this work, we investigate how humans respond to a broad array of questions under variable vocabulary limitations, consisting of only 250 highly frequent words at the most restrictive. We provide theoretically motivated comparisons to greedy and globally optimal sampling algorithms using Sequential Monte Carlo inference with large language models. Humans generally resemble greedy sampling more than globally optimal sampling, though more skilled humans are more likely to backtrack and revise -- a non-greedy behavior. An observed human pattern of leaning on semantically light words in high-constraint settings falls out of both greedy and globally optimal sampling. We discuss the results and their broader implications for resource-rational cognition, psycholinguistics, L2 communication, and language impairments.
We model utterance production as probabilistic cost-sensitive choice over contextual alternatives, using information-theoretic notions of cost. We distinguish between goal-directed alternatives that realise a fixed communicative intent and goal-agnostic alternatives defined only by contextual plausibility, allowing us to derive speaker- and listener-oriented interpretations of different cost measures. We present a procedure to generate both types of alternative sets using language models. Analysing production choices in open-ended dialogue under both deterministic and probabilistic cost minimisation, we find that surprisal minimisation relative to goal-directed alternatives provides the strongest predictive account under both analyses. By contrast, uniform information density and length-based costs exhibit weaker and less consistent predictive power across conditions. More broadly, our study suggests that alternative-conditioned optimisation with LM-generated alternatives provides a principled framework for studying speaker and listener pressures in naturalistic language production.