Rethinking the Rank Threshold for LoRA Fine-Tuning

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has become the standard mechanism for fine-tuning large pretrained models, yet its statistical properties remain only partially understood. Existing generalization results provide upper bounds of the form O~(sqrt(rd/n)) or O~(rd/n), but a matching lower bound is missing, and the question of how to choose the LoRA rank r has no formal answer. Both gaps are closed here. A local Rademacher argument establishes an upper bound of O~(rd/n) on the excess risk of the empirical risk minimizer over rank-r LoRA, whenever the target adaptation has rank at most r. A matching minimax lower bound of Omega(rd/n) is then proved via a Fano-type packing of the rank-r subspace of R^{d x d}; the bound applies to any estimator whose output lies in the rank-r LoRA class. Combining the two yields a rank-selection dichotomy. For the constrained empirical risk minimizer, the optimal rank equals the intrinsic rank r*, and over-ranking strictly hurts. For adaptive estimators of the nuclear-norm-then-truncate type, over-ranking is harmless and the rate saturates at Theta~(r* d / n) regardless of r. Taken together, the three results characterize the statistical complexity of LoRA fine-tuning within the well-specified locally quadratic regime, and identify the empirically observed over-parameterization penalty as a property of unregularized empirical risk minimization rather than of the LoRA class itself. Predictions of the theory are verified on a synthetic trace-regression benchmark and on real LoRA fine-tuning across three (model, task) configurations covering DistilBERT and RoBERTa on SST-2 and MRPC. All configurations exhibit the predicted U-shape in validation loss, with two showing statistically significant loss inflation at large ranks (paired permutation p = 0.016).

Fine-tuning adapts a pre-trained model to downstream tasks using a small amount of labeled data. Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) is an efficient fine-tuning method that reduces memory and computation costs while often achieving performance close to full fine-tuning. Despite its widespread use, the theoretical behavior of LoRA is not yet well understood. In this paper, we study LoRA in a simple linear regression setting and compare its excess risk with that of full fine-tuning. Our analysis identifies regimes in which LoRA achieves lower excess risk than full fine-tuning in both overdetermined and underdetermined settings. Specifically, our theory predicts that LoRA can outperform full fine-tuning when the difference between the pretraining and the downstream tasks is effectively low-rank. We further show how the choice of LoRA rank affects generalization performance, explaining why using a very small rank can improve test accuracy in certain settings, even though it limits model expressivity. Finally, we support our theoretical results with experiments on practical tasks, suggesting that the identified tradeoffs and insights extend beyond linear regression.

Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization enables large-language-model fine-tuning without storing backpropagation activations, while LoRA supplies compact trainable adapters. Combining them creates a rank paradox: increasing LoRA rank improves adapter capacity, but standard two-point ZO either perturbs a rank-dependent number of coordinates or, under atomwise updates, can make the finite-difference signal unobservable. This paper shows that the bottleneck is a measurement-topology problem rather than a need for an external subspace. LoRA already decomposes into matched rank-$1$ atoms, each a complete factor-coordinate block of dimension $d_\text{out}+d_\text{in}$. Querying one atom per step keeps the stored adapter rank $r$ while removing $r$ from the single-query perturbation dimension. The naive atomwise query is still miscalibrated: if it inherits canonical LoRA scaling $α/r$, the active finite-difference signal shrinks as $1/r$ and the active finite-difference signal-to-noise ratio (FD-SNR) as $1/r^2$, producing directional collapse under a fixed residual evaluation-noise floor. AR1-ZO pairs alternating rank-$1$ atom queries with topology-aware scaling $γ=αr$, restoring rank-invariant active signal without auxiliary bases, activation hooks, curvature estimates, or extra forward queries. Theory proves atom minimality, rank-independent active query dimension, directional collapse and restoration, and the remaining rank dependence as an amortized coverage cost. Experiments on OPT and Qwen3 models validate the signal mechanism and show that AR1-ZO makes high-rank LoRA effective among matched-budget ZO methods under the standard two-forward-pass query budget.