cs.LGMay 5, 2026

QUIVER: Cost-Aware Adaptive Preference Querying in Surrogate-Assisted Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization

Authors: Florian A. D. Burnat

Organizations: University of Warwick Warwick Business School Coventry, England, UK

Abstract

Interactive multi-objective optimization systems face a budget allocation dilemma: one can spend resources on expensive objective evaluations or on eliciting decision-maker preferences that identify the relevant region of the Pareto set. Moreover, preference elicitation itself spans modalities with different information content and cognitive burden, ranging from cheap, noisy pairwise preference statements (PS) to richer but costlier indifference adjustments (IA). We study cost-aware optimization under an unknown scalarization and introduce QUIVER (Query-Informed Value Estimation for Regret), a surrogate-assisted evolutionary multi-objective optimizer that adaptively chooses between objective evaluations and heterogeneous preference queries. At each step, QUIVER selects the next action by maximizing the expected decision-quality improvement per unit total cost. Across DTLZ and WFG benchmarks under synthetic decision-maker models, QUIVER achieves the lowest final utility regret on challenging WFG problems (utility regret of 2.14 on WFG4, 2.82 on WFG9: a 25% improvement over baselines), outperforming all single-modality baselines. We analyze how the optimal mix of PS and IA adapts to problem difficulty: on easy problems (DTLZ2), QUIVER selects 80% PS queries; on hard problems (WFG9), it shifts to 35% IA queries. This adaptive modality selection demonstrates cost-aware preference learning in action.

Explore similar work

Jun 7, 2026cs.LG

Provably Efficient Personalized Multi-Objective Bandits with Proactive Conversational Queries

Personalized decision-making in multi-objective bandits requires learning user-specific trade-offs among competing objectives. Since arm utility depends on both unknown rewards and unknown preferences, existing methods infer preferences only from utility feedback, entangling preference learning with reward exploration. In practice, however, users often reveal their priorities through proactive conversational queries (e.g., "cheap and clean hotel"), yet this structured signal is not leveraged. We formalize a proactive query-based framework in which user queries provide structured preference signals. Modeling these signals via a Plackett-Luce subset choice model, we show that query-only learning is insufficient due to a fundamental shift-invariance barrier. To resolve this, we introduce MO-PQUCB, a hybrid algorithm that integrates query-based preference anchoring with bandit feedback through shift-invariant regularization and dual-exploration UCB. We prove that proactive queries accelerate preference estimation and yield improved regret scaling over prior preference-aware MO-MAB methods. Under corrupted queries, we further characterize statistical limits and design a robust estimator achieving near-optimal performance when the corruption is sparse. Experiments validate both theoretical and practical gains.
Linfeng Cao, Ming Shi, Ness B. Shroff
Jun 20, 2026cs.LG

Selective Ensemble Based on Preference-Directed Multi-Objective Bandits

Selective ensemble for modern machine learning systems requires choosing promising model candidates under limited evaluation budgets, while downstream tasks often specify only partial preferences over capabilities such as accuracy, robustness, and reasoning. This setting naturally gives rise to a sequential decision problem under partially specified linear preferences. We formalize it as preference-directed multi-objective bandits (PDMOB), where admissible trade-offs are represented by a polyhedral preference cone. Based on this formulation, we introduce Pareto CC-optimality, which recovers standard Pareto optimality and single-weight scalarization as special cases. We then propose the preference-directed upper confidence bound (PrefUCB) algorithm, which maintains directional confidence intervals to guide exploration. We analyze both indicator-based and gap-weighted regret, and establish instance-dependent logarithmic bounds for both criteria, recovering the optimal logarithmic dependence on the horizon TT in classical special cases. Experiments on large pre-trained model selective ensemble tasks and online asset allocation under institutional mandates validate the efficacy of our method.
Lanjihong Ma, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Masashi Sugiyama +1
Jul 28, 2026cs.LG

Top-kk Pareto Bandits: Hypervolume Regret for Multi-Objective Slate Selection

We consider a stochastic multi-objective bandit problem where, at each round, the agent selects a slate of kk arms and observes their dd-dimensional reward vectors under semi-bandit feedback. We do not aim at identifying a single optimal arm; instead, we consider the problem of maintaining a small set of actions that jointly approximate the Pareto frontier. We formalize this objective through the dominated hypervolume induced by the selected subset of arms, and define an αα-approximate hypervolume regret with respect to the best size-kk subset achievable in hindsight, where α=11/eα= 1 - 1/e reflects the approximation guarantee of greedy maximization for monotone submodular functions. To address this problem, we introduce \textit{THV-UCB}, an optimistic algorithm that selects arms greedily based on optimistic estimates of their marginal hypervolume contributions. We establish a gap-free regret bound O~(dnkT)\tilde{O}(d\sqrt{nkT}) that holds on every instance, together with a gap-dependent bound O~(nk2.5/Δmin)\tilde{O}(nk^{2.5}/Δ_{\min}) that becomes polylogarithmic in TT once the arms are sufficiently well separated. Our results provide theoretical support for using small subsets to approximate Pareto fronts in various multi-objective applications.
Nicolas Gutowski, Fabien Chhel, Alexandre Letard +1