A geometric relation of the error introduced by sampling a language model's output distribution to its internal state

In autoregressive large language models (LLMs), temporal straightening offers an account of how the next-token prediction objective shapes representations. Models learn to progressively straighten the representational trajectory of input sequences across layers, potentially facilitating next-token prediction via linear extrapolation. However, a direct link between this trajectory and token-level behavior has been missing. We provide such a link by relating contextual curvature-a geometric measure of how sharply the representational trajectory bends over recent context-to next-token entropy. Across two models (GPT-2 XL and Pythia-2.8B), contextual curvature is correlated with entropy, and this relationship emerges during training. Perturbation experiments reveal selective dependence: manipulating curvature through trajectory-aligned interventions reliably modulates entropy, while geometrically misaligned perturbations have no effect. Finally, regularizing representations to be straighter during training modestly reduces token-level entropy without degrading validation loss. These results identify trajectory curvature as a task-aligned representational feature that influences behavioral uncertainty in LLMs.

Reasoning-trained language models often spend more tokens on harder problems, but longer chains of thought do not show whether a model is merely computing for more steps or following a different internal trajectory. We study this distinction through hidden-state trajectories during chain-of-thought generation across competitive programming, mathematics, and Boolean satisfiability. Raw trajectory geometry is strongly shaped by generation length: longer generations mechanically alter path statistics, so difficulty-dependent comparisons are misleading without adjustment. After residualizing trajectory statistics on length, difficulty remains systematically coupled to corrected trajectory geometry across all domains studied. The clearest reasoning-specific separation appears in the code domain, where harder problems show more direct corrected trajectories and less heterogeneous local curvature in reasoning-trained models than in matched instruction-tuned baselines. Corrected difficulty-geometry coupling is weaker, but still present, in mathematics and Boolean satisfiability. Prompt-stage linear probes do not mirror the code-domain separation, and behavioral annotations show that stronger corrected coupling co-occurs with strategy shifts and uncertainty monitoring. Together, these findings establish length correction as a prerequisite for generation-time trajectory analysis and show that reasoning training can be associated with distinct corrected trajectory geometry, with the strength of the effect depending on the domain.

Large language models learn similar behaviours, yet it remains unclear what structure they share or how to change one behaviour without disturbing others. The Fisher-Rao geometry of next-token probabilities connects these questions: behaviour determines this geometry up to output-preserving symmetries, whereas activation geometry depends on coordinates. Across transformer, state-space and recurrent models, output geometries agree more strongly than activation geometries, and shared geometry supports semantic-category transfer. Agreement with human word choices increases with predictive accuracy, scale and training, and improves further after model-only calibration. Token probabilities and read-out geometry jointly predict the spectrum and its effective dimension. Controlled language assignments show that geometry follows the language law across architectures. Pretraining corpus statistics predict held-out fact acquisition without recalibration, while randomised experiments show that deeper evidence substantially delays acquisition across every tested architecture and evidence construction. Finally, the geometry prescribes minimum-disturbance local interventions, predicts their relative cost, and supports reusable control: updates learned on donor prompts transfer to unseen prompts while better preserving behaviour on reference prompts than Euclidean control. The same geometric correction improves steering, editing, attribution, dictionary learning and fine-tuning.