A Scalable Digital Twin Framework for Energy Optimization in Data Centers

Data centers are increasingly optimized by artificial intelligence and, at the same time, increasingly loaded by it. The literature treats these as two unrelated problems: control studies model workload as an exogenous arrival process, while sustainability studies model infrastructure as a fixed multiplier. We screen roughly 194 papers retrieved through a documented protocol, code 63 of them, and report what the coding shows. Of 28 primary control-oriented studies, 18 are validated in simulation alone and 5 reach physical hardware or a production facility; none account for water withdrawal, and none account for embodied carbon. Reported savings intervals across four technique families overlap almost completely, which means the field cannot presently rank its own methods. Ten recurring gaps are scored for consequence and tractability, and we set out CLEAR-DC, a framework coupling a control-policy branch to a workload-demand branch through an explicit elasticity term, reads out net rather than direct benefit, and emits a schema-conformant record covering energy, carbon, water, embodied share and validation venue. The framework is an architectural and methodological proposal, not a trained system; the contribution we defend empirically is the corpus analysis and the reporting schema derived from it. Coding sheet, derived statistics and all result artifacts: https://github.com/Kimalice/AI-for-Energy-Optimization-in-Data-Centers-Closing-the-Optimizer-Load-Loop

The rapid growth of LLM inference is shifting sustainability concerns from one-time training to continuous serving, where infrastructure decisions shape energy use, carbon emissions, water consumption, and service quality. Yet operators often need to compare deployment alternatives before large-scale infrastructure is built, making direct measurement costly, slow, and sometimes infeasible. We present InFactPlanner, a trace-driven decision-support framework for what-if analysis of sustainable AI data center deployment for LLM inference across single and geo-distributed sites. InFactPlanner combines query traces, hardware-model profiles, candidate site configurations, PUE/WUE parameters, renewable generation models, and time-varying grid carbon intensity to estimate power, energy, carbon emissions, water use, latency, and server utilization. The framework abstracts low-level serving effects into configurable hardware-model profiles, enabling rapid comparison of site selection, capacity placement, hardware, model, renewable integration, and routing choices. We validate the energy accounting pipeline by reproducing reference LLM inference energy estimates with less than 10% deviation, evaluate scalability across multiple data centers and server counts, and demonstrate scenario-driven decision analyses for hardware selection, renewable placement, geographic deployment, and carbon-aware routing. Our results show that sustainability-optimal choices can differ from latency-optimal ones, and that the carbon value of deployment depends strongly on the local grid mix.

This paper studies Reinforcement Learning as an online controller for curtailment-aware workload shifting in wind-turbine-integrated high-performance computing (HPC) data centers. We introduce a reproducible fixed-day simulation framework with synthetic wind and price signals and delayed completion feedback, designed to be extensible toward more complex scenarios. As a controlled benchmarking basis, we then focus on the minimal case with one wind turbine and one co-located data center. In this setting, pure Reinforcement Learning exhibits a pronounced credit-assignment problem and tends to underuse free wind energy early in the day. We therefore evaluate two complementary countermeasures: optimization-based Imitation Learning and potential-based Reward Shaping. Across multi-seed training and a 200-day test set, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and a Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) variant with an additional on-policy update routine achieve strong empirical performance among learned policies, and both Imitation Learning and Reward Shaping provide improvements in relevant configurations. A performance gap to the optimizer remains, which is expected: the optimizer plans offline with full-day foresight, whereas Reinforcement Learning must decide online from current observations without future realizations. The benchmark and ablation results provide a transparent basis for extending the approach toward richer multi-site and continuous-time scenarios.