Uncertainty-Aware Structured Data Extraction from Full CMR Reports via Distilled LLMs

Objectives: Automatic data extraction from free-text radiology reports enables large-scale research, but few studies assessed the performance of large language models (LLMs) on Dutch neuroradiology reports. Methods: We analyzed 947 brain MRI reports from a tertiary memory clinic (2016-2021), authored by consultant neuroradiologists. Trained medical students annotated thirty variables; 100 reports were double-annotated to assess inter-rater reliability. We evaluated the performance of the open-weight LLM LLaMA 3.1 using different languages (Dutch vs. English translation) and few-shot prompting with different example selection strategies. Performance was evaluated using balanced accuracy for categorical variables, accuracy and mean absolute error for counts, and text similarity for free-text. Metrics were computed across 10 random splits of the 947 reports. Results: LLaMA 3.1 demonstrated high zero-shot performance for visual rating scores (mean [95%-CI]): Medial Temporal Atrophy: 90% [77-100%] on the left and 96% [94-99%] on the right, Global Cortical Atrophy: 87% [83-91%], and Fazekas: 94% [93-96%]. Microbleed mentions were detected with 93% accuracy [92-95%] and infarct mentions with 82% [80-84%]. Text similarity for lesion location reached 0.95 [0.95-0.96]. Performance was lower for numerical variables: 80% [78-82%] for the number of microbleeds and 66% [63-68%] for infarcts. English translation yielded comparable results. Few-shot prompting improved performance for numerical variables, achieving 92% [90-93%] for microbleeds and 81% [77-85%] for infarcts using structural similarity-based selection. Conclusion: LLaMA 3.1 shows strong potential for extracting data from Dutch neuroradiology reports. Few-shot prompting enhances performance for numerical variables, whereas challenges remain for location-specific variables.

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown strong performance on public medical benchmarks, yet existing evaluations often remain weak proxies for clinical use, relying on isolated inputs and simplified recognition-style tasks. We introduce CardioLens, a leakage-resistant evaluation testbed for multi-sequence Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR), constructed from private hospital archives through a rigorous report-to-QA construction and verification pipeline. CardioLens contains 473,896 slices and 13,494 verified QA pairs across 4D Cine, LGE, perfusion, and T2-weighted imaging, and evaluates three stages of CMR interpretation: image understanding, report generation, and disease diagnosis. Across 24 state-of-the-art MLLMs, CardioLens reveals a substantial clinical reality gap: models perform poorly overall, with performance degrading along the real CMR workflow. Confusion analysis further shows a category-collapse failure mode, where models default to frequent abnormal categories rather than distinguishing clinically distinct findings. To rule out MLLM-compatible input construction as the primary cause, we compare random, clinically motivated, and data-driven slice selection protocols under different slice budgets; performance changes only marginally, typically by about 1%. Explicit reasoning prompts also fail to rescue performance, often making models more conservative rather than improving visual evidence use. These results show that current MLLMs remain far from reliable CMR interpretation, where clinical decisions require integrating distributed evidence across sequences, views, and temporal phases. CardioLens provides a clinically grounded testbed for developing next-generation MLLMs toward real-world clinical deployment.

Aims: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging enables non-invasive assessment of myocardial structure, function, and pathology, but requires substantial experience in interpretation of CMR images that could be supported by artificial intelligence (AI)-based models. However, use of AI models for enhanced CMR reading is limited by labor-intensive data curation, suboptimal model performance, and unclear implementation pathways. Methods and results: We developed an automated data curation pipeline for CMR-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) diagnosis, integrating open-source locally-run large language models (LLMs) to extract diagnostic labels from narrative CMR reports and preprocessing multimodal imaging data, including cine and late-gadolinium-enhancement (LGE) CMR sequences. Three vision foundation models (DINO, VST, UMedPT) were fine-tuned across these modalities in a two-stage approach. The dataset comprised hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM), cardiac amyloidosis (CA), and normal controls (NOR). A total of 988 curated cases were randomly divided into 742 for training and 246 for validation. Fine-tuned AI-models achieved high discriminative diagnostic performance on an independent test set comprising 1067 patients , with individual AUC-ROC values of up to 0.937 for the correct diagnosis of HCM and 0.945 for cardiac amyloidosis. Ensemble strategies combining multiple models and modalities further improved AI-based diagnostic accuracy and robustness, achieving the highest overall diagnostic performance for HCM (AUC=0.959, CI [0.936-0.978]), CA (AUC=0.966, CI [0.939-0.986]), NOR (AUC=0.872, CI [0.852-0.894]), DCM (AUC=0.848, CI [0.808-0.885]) and ICM (AUC=0.840, CI [0.809-0.868]). All training and inference code, along with the trained model weights, are publicly available on https://github.com/sinaamirrajab/CMR_CVD.