A Paired Point-of-Care Ultrasound Dataset for Image Quality Enhancement and Benchmarking via a cGAN Baseline

Ultrasound imaging is the most widely adopted medical modality globally due to its low cost and portability, yet artificial intelligence (AI) deployment remains constrained by reliance on GPU-accelerated models, creating a structural paradox where the cost of "intelligence" exceeds that of the imaging device itself. Here, we present the systematic adaptation and extensive evaluation of UltraSeg, an ultra-lightweight architecture originally developed for colonoscopic polyp segmentation, now engineered for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) across ten public datasets spanning six anatomical sites (breast, thyroid, kidney, carotid, fetal, and small-animal tumor). We systematically validate both variants in ultrasound domains: UltraSeg-130K (0.13M parameters) achieves 89.7 FPS on single-core CPUs and 34.8 FPS on a refurbished mobile device, while UltraSeg-500K (0.5M parameters) delivers 44.6 FPS on CPU and 16.1 FPS on mobile device. UltraSeg-500K matches or exceeds the Dice performance of the 31M-parameter UNet and approaches 105M-parameter TransUNet in average performance, with superior zero-shot cross-dataset generalization on external validation sets (UDIAT, DDTI). By enabling clinical-grade segmentation without GPU dependency, this work brings AI costs in line with ultrasound accessibility, making advanced diagnostics available in resource-limited settings.

Self-supervised learning (SSL) can reduce the need for labelled medical images, but the choice of pretext objective remains unclear for lung ultrasound (LUS). Contrastive learning, masked reconstruction, and joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) differ in the space in which their targets are defined, yet existing ultrasound studies compare them under different corpora, backbones, and evaluation protocols. We compare these three objective families using the same encoder backbone, pretraining corpus, optimisation schedule, and frozen-evaluation protocol. Encoders are pretrained on COVID-BLUeS LUS videos and evaluated with linear, $k$NN, and attentive probes at 5%, 10%, 50%, and 100% label budgets. Evaluation is performed on POCUS using patient-level five-fold cross-validation and on the independently acquired Mendeley-Uganda dataset, which is excluded from both pretraining and probe fitting. At the full label budget under linear probing, VideoMAE and V-JEPA achieve $66.5 \pm 13.1$ and $65.4 \pm 11.7$ balanced accuracy on POCUS, while MoCo achieves $42.1 \pm 1.2$. On Mendeley-Uganda, the ranking reverses: MoCo performs best at $62.7 \pm 1.0$, followed by VideoMAE at $53.8 \pm 2.8$, while V-JEPA falls near chance at $35.1 \pm 4.9$. These results show that POCUS probe accuracy alone does not identify the objective that transfers best across datasets. We also outline planned representation-level analyses to examine this reversal. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/moeinheidari7829/LUSVideoSSL.

Conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs) have enabled high-fidelity computational staining and destaining of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in digital pathology whole-slide images (WSI). However, their ability to generalize to out-of-distribution WSI across institutions without retraining remains insufficiently characterized. Previously developed cGAN models trained on 102 registered prostate core biopsy WSIs from Brigham and Women's Hospital were evaluated on 82 spatially unregistered WSIs acquired at Stanford University. To mitigate domain shift without retraining, a preprocessing pipeline consisting of histogram-based stain normalization for H&E-stained WSIs and channel-wise intensity calibration for unstained WSIs was developed. Because image registration was intentionally omitted for real-world deployment conditions, the reported quantitative results are conservative lower bounds reflecting both model performance and limited spatial alignment. Under these conditions, virtual destaining achieved a Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of 0.854, structural similarity index measure (SSIM) of 0.699, and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) of 18.41 dB. H&E restaining from computationally destained outputs outperformed direct staining from ground-truth unstained inputs across all metrics (PCC: 0.798 vs. 0.715; SSIM: 0.756 vs. 0.718; PSNR: 20.08 vs. 18.51 dB), suggesting that preprocessing quality may be more limiting than model capacity. Qualitative pathological review indicated preservation of benign glandular structures while showing that malignant glands were often rendered with vessel-like morphologies. These findings support the feasibility of applying cGAN-based computational H&E staining and destaining generative models to external WSI datasets using preprocessing-based adaptation alone while defining specific morphological targets for future domain adaptation.