Classical coding-theoretic guarantees often rely on trust assumptions, such as requiring sufficiently many honest nodes compared with adversarial ones. These assumptions are difficult to enforce in open decentralized systems where participants are not centrally certified. At the same time, such environments often contain incentive mechanisms: participants may be rewarded only when their submitted data are accepted and the system remains functional. This changes the role of an adversary. Rather than acting as a pure saboteur, a strategic adversary may submit data that are consistent enough to be accepted while still degrading the quality of the final estimate. The game-of-coding framework models this strategic interaction between a data collector (DC) and an adversary. Existing works on the game of coding mostly consider the complete-information case, where the DC knows how the adversary trades off acceptance and estimation error. In this paper, we study an incomplete-information version of the game of coding in which the DC, acting as a Stackelberg leader, does not know the adversary's utility trade-off and must learn through repeated interaction. Prior work on the unknown-adversary setting considered an explore-then-commit objective, where only the final selected acceptance rule is evaluated. In contrast, we study the full learning trajectory: every acceptance rule used during the algorithm is executed and contributes to performance. We propose an algorithm that refines its search around promising acceptance rules, prove that it achieves sublinear cumulative regret, and evaluate its performance through numerical experiments.
This paper studies an online variant of the assistance games framework, where an informed agent and an uninformed agent repeatedly interact over T timesteps to optimize a common reward function. While the informed agent (the human) observes a latent state of the world, the uninformed agent (the assistant) observes only the human's actions. We provide the first provably efficient learning algorithms for repeated assistance games. We introduce the notion of assistance regret: the gap between the cumulative utility of interactions and that of the optimal joint policies in hindsight, which map latent states to action pairs. We present decentralized algorithms for both the human and the assistant that achieve a (1−1/e)-approximate assistance regret rate of O(T3/4), with runtime polynomial in the size of the action and state spaces. These algorithms are general; in particular, they accommodate any no-regret algorithm for the assistant. We prove that achieving a regret approximation factor better than (1−1/e) is computationally intractable. Furthermore, we demonstrate how these generic no-regret algorithms can be tailored to a pseudo-decentralized setting -- using a shared random string -- to achieve a rate of O(T1/2), optimal up to logarithmic factors.
Nivasini Ananthakrishnan, Mark Bedaywi, Michael I. Jordan +2
Decentralized machine learning often relies on outsourcing computations, such as gradient evaluations, to untrusted worker nodes. Existing robust aggregation methods can mitigate malicious behavior under honest-majority assumptions, but may fail when adversaries control a majority of the workers. We study this adversary-dominated setting through an incentive-oriented framework in which reports are accepted and rewarded only when they are mutually consistent up to a threshold. This turns the adversary from a pure saboteur into a rational agent that trades off increasing estimation error against the risk of rejection and loss of reward. We consider iterative optimization under this model. Unlike one-shot computation, iterative learning requires long-horizon decisions: permissive acceptance rules enable faster early progress but admit more adversarial corruption, while strict rules improve estimation accuracy but cause frequent rejections. We propose \mathsf{VISTA}, an adaptive algorithm that tunes the acceptance threshold using the optimization history. Numerical results show that \mathsf{VISTA} improves convergence over static thresholds. We also provide a rigorous convergence analysis showing that, with suitable incentive-aware adaptation, adversary-dominated decentralized learning can retain the asymptotic convergence behavior of standard SGD without relying on an honest majority.
We initiate the study of structured Stackelberg games, a novel form of strategic interaction between a leader and a follower where contextual information can be predictive of the follower's (unknown) type. Motivated by applications such as security games and AI safety, we show how this additional structure can help the leader learn a utility-maximizing policy in both the online and distributional settings. In the online setting, we first prove that standard learning-theoretic measures of complexity do not characterize the difficulty of the leader's learning task. Notably, we find that there exists a learning-theoretic measure of complexity, analogous to the Littlestone dimension in online classification, that tightly characterizes the leader's instance-optimal regret. We term this the Stackelberg-Littlestone dimension, and leverage it to provide a provably optimal online learning algorithm. In the distributional setting, we provide analogous results by showing that two new dimensions control the sample complexity upper- and lower-bound.