Over the past two decades, the task of musical beat tracking has transitioned from heuristic onset detection algorithms to highly capable deep neural networks (DNN). Although DNN-based beat tracking models achieve near-perfect performance on mainstream, percussive datasets, the SMC dataset has stubbornly yielded low F-measure scores. By testing how well state-of-the-art models detect beats on individual tracks in the SMC dataset, we identify three distinct failure modes: octave errors, continuity errors, and complete tracking failure where all metrics fall below 0.3. We reveal that state-of-the-art models tend to generate "confident-but-wrong" activations. Furthermore, we show that the standard DBN's default minimum tempo of 55 BPM prevents it from inferring the correct tempo for 21% of SMC tracks, forcing double-tempo predictions on slow music. By exposing such fundamental oversights, we provide concrete directions for improving beat and downbeat detection, specifically emphasizing training data diversification and multi-hypothesis tempo estimation.
Current neural networks for beat tracking generate invalid outputs, such as consecutive downbeats and erratic tempo changes, even when these are not present in the training data. Heavy post-processing techniques can alleviate these problems, but the original cause of this inconsistent behaviour remains unknown. We hypothesise that it stems from inadequate modelling of multiple plausible output beat grids, resulting in an invalid mixture of competing interpretations. We propose a masked diffusion approach that properly models multiple outputs and enables the model to build coherent predictions through iterative inference. We devise three modifications to standard masked diffusion that enable its application to beat tracking: independent masking of beats and downbeats during training and inference, a balanced masking scheduler for inference, and peak-picking across inference steps. Our approach reduces erratic behaviours and improves beat-tracking performance.
Francesco Foscarin, Filip Korzeniowski, Richard Vogl
Empirical performance analysis depends on the accurate extraction of tempo data from recordings, yet standard computational tools, designed for monophonic audio or modern studio conditions, fail systematically when applied to historical polyphonic chamber music. This paper documents the failure of automated beat-detection software on duo recordings of Beethoven's five piano and cello sonatas (Op.~5 Nos.1 and2; Op.~69; Op.~102 Nos.1 and2), and presents a formalised manual alternative: a cumulative lap-timer protocol that yields bar-level beats-per-minute data with millisecond resolution. The protocol, developed in cross-disciplinary collaboration with an engineer specialising in VLSI design, rests on a cumulative timestamp architecture that prevents error accumulation, permits internal self-validation, and captures expressive timing phenomena (rubato, fermatas, accelerandi, ritardandi) that automated tools systematically suppress or misread. The mathematical derivation of the BPM formula, the spreadsheet data structure, and the error characterisation are presented in full. Applied to over one hundred movement-level recordings spanning 1930--2012, the protocol generated a dataset subsequently visualised through tempographs, histograms with spline-smoothed probability density functions, ridgeline plots, and combination charts. The paper argues that manual annotation is not a methodological retreat but a principled response to the intrinsic limitations of computational tools when faced with the specific challenges of polyphonic historical recordings. The complete dataset and analysis code are publicly available.
Recent Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have demonstrated promising abilities in understanding musical content. However, whether their responses are grounded in the correct temporal regions of the audio remains underexplored. This limitation is particularly critical for music understanding, where key information often occurs as temporally localized events, such as instrument entries and rhythmic transitions. To address this gap, we introduce MusTBench, a music-expert-validated benchmark designed to evaluate temporal grounding in LALMs through five temporally grounded question-answering tasks. To further improve temporal grounding in existing models, we propose MusT, a novel four-stage temporal optimization recipe spanning music encoder adaptation, LLM adaptation, LLM supervised fine-tuning, and RL-based optimization. Experiments on MusTBench show that existing LALMs struggle with precise temporal grounding, while MusT brings significant improvements over strong baselines. These results establish temporal grounding as a key missing capability in current LALMs and position MusTBench as a challenging benchmark for future research in temporally grounded music understanding.