State-of-art minibatches via novel DPP kernels: discretization, wavelets, and rough objectives

Determinantal point processes have recently emerged as a kernel-based alternative to standard independent sampling for constructing efficient minibatches, coresets, and other compact representations of large-scale datasets. In particular, sampling mechanisms based on DPPs are believed to demonstrate better approximation properties compared to classical i.i.d. samplers, even at the scale of the exponent. One of the key strengths of DPP based samplers is that they can be deployed over very general spaces, in contrast to more classical sampling methods beyond i.i.d. which tend to work in very well-structured settings, principally Euclidean spaces. In this work, we establish explicit rate guarantees for determinantal sampling in spaces that extend far beyond known Euclidean setups, focusing on spectral kernels obtained from eigenspaces of naturally associated Laplacian and other Markov diffusion operators. This includes, in particular, Riemannian manifolds and weighted networks. In determinantal sampling from compact Riemannian manifolds, we establish sampling rates that automatically pick up the intrinsic dimensionality $d_{\text{int}}$ of the underlying manifold. In the setting of networks, we investigate DPP-based samplers on the celebrated k-nearest neighbour graphs, as well as weighted random geometric graphs, and demonstrate a similar improved dependence on the intrinsic dimensionality of the data. Overall, our approach achieves guarantees of $\big(\text{sample size}\big)^{-\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2d_{\text{int}}}}$ that match known rates on Euclidean spaces of comparable dimension. In terms of techniques, we connect to the celebrated Weyl's Law for manifold spectra, and leverage tools from the theory of Markov diffusions and Dirichlet forms as well as certain ingredients from the theory of pseudodifferential operators, which could be of independent interest in this area.

Selecting a small, diverse, high-quality subset from a massive pool of candidates is a recurring primitive in modern machine learning -- data curation and coreset selection for training and fine-tuning large models, active-learning batch acquisition, prompt and exemplar selection for in-context learning, retrieval diversification, and experimental design. Determinantal Point Processes (\DPP s) give a principled, well-calibrated notion of diversity for this task, but their \emph{MAP} objective -- pick a size-$k$ subset $S$ maximizing $\logdet(L_S)$ -- is NP-hard, and the standard greedy and sampling algorithms scale superlinearly in the ground-set size $n$. This cost is prohibitive precisely in the data-centric regime where diversity matters most, where $n$ ranges over millions to billions of candidate examples, features, or embeddings. We recast \DPP-MAP as a continuous optimization problem over the Stiefel manifold, and show that its first-order optimality conditions form a \emph{Nonlinear Eigenvalue Problem with eigenvector dependency} (\NEPv) of a previously unstudied form. This \NEPv\ admits a self-consistent field (\SCF) iteration with a spectral-gap-based local contraction guarantee, giving a principled iterative solver where the diversity objective drives an eigenvector-dependent operator. The resulting algorithm, \OurMethod, requires only matrix-vector products with the kernel and runs in time $O\!\big((ndk+nk^2)\,t\big)$ for a small number of iterations $t$, scaling near-linearly in $n$ and integrating directly with low-rank and feature-map kernels common in ML. This paper focuses on the relaxation, solver, and scaling analysis; full real-data benchmarking is left to a planned empirical study.

The standard Monte Carlo estimator $\widehat{I}_N^{\mathrm{MC}}$ of $\int fdω$ relies on independent samples from $ω$ and has variance of order $1/N$. Replacing the samples with a determinantal point process (DPP), a repulsive distribution, makes the estimator consistent, with variance rates that depend on how the DPP is adapted to $f$ and $ω$. We examine two existing DPP-based estimators: one by Bardenet & Hardy (2020) with a rate of $\mathcal{O}(N^{-(1+1/d)})$ for smooth $f$, but relying on a fixed DPP. The other, by Ermakov & Zolotukhin (1960), is unbiased with rate of order $1/N$, like Monte Carlo, but its DPP is tailored to $f$. We revisit these estimators, generalize them to continuous settings, and provide sampling algorithms.