AdaGraph: A Graph-Native Clustering Algorithm That Overcomes the Curse of Dimensionality and Enables Scientific Discovery

Ahmed Elmahdi

cs.LGMay 5, 2026

AdaGraph: A Graph-Native Clustering Algorithm That Overcomes the Curse of Dimensionality and Enables Scientific Discovery

Authors: Ahmed Elmahdi

Organizations: Independent Researcher

Abstract

We present AdaGraph, a graph-native clustering algorithm born from the Structure-Centric Machine Learning (SC-ML) paradigm -- a new field of unsupervised learning that replaces geometry-centric (distance-based) computation with structure-centric (topology-based) computation, fundamentally dissolving the curse of dimensionality. AdaGraph operates entirely within the kNN graph topology, a representation that retains meaningful relational structure in arbitrarily high dimensions where Euclidean distance metrics become uninformative. AdaGraph requires no a priori specification of the number of clusters k, handles noise natively, and scales via the SLCD (Sample-Learn-Calibrate-Deploy) prototype-deployment framework. As its unsupervised tuning objective, AdaGraph pairs with Graph-SCOPE, the topology-based cluster validity index introduced as a separate SC-ML contribution. On 10 synthetic benchmarks spanning d=10 to d=5000, Graph-SCOPE achieves mean ARI=0.900 and correctly selects k on 9/10 datasets -- outperforming Silhouette, Davies-Bouldin, and Calinski-Harabasz -- while maintaining Kendall tau >= 0.92 with ground-truth cluster quality across all dimensionalities (Silhouette: tau ~= 0.46). We validate AdaGraph across three scientific domains: (1) gene co-expression discovery in hepatocellular carcinoma (GSE14520, 10,000 genes, 488 patients, no dimensionality reduction), where AdaGraph identifies condition-specific gene modules that WGCNA, ICA, NMF, and Spectral Biclustering fail to resolve; (2) natural language text clustering, where AdaGraph achieves ARI=0.751 on 20NG-6cat versus HDBSCAN's 0.464 (62% relative improvement); (3) materials science clustering of superconductors (145-dimensional Magpie features), perovskites, and JARVIS-DFT materials, where AdaGraph achieves the highest Graph-SCOPE on all three datasets.

Explore similar work

Sep 21, 2026cs.LG

G-NAC: Graph Neural Automata Clustering via Emergent Domain Formation

We introduce Graph Neural Automata Clustering (G-NAC), an unsupervised clustering method in which observations interact as cells on a fixed neighborhood graph. A shared recurrent graph-neural cellular rule evolves latent domain states through local interactions, which are converted into a rank-based spectral affinity for partitioning. Across 73 clustering tasks from 57 benchmark datasets, G-NAC achieved a mean adjusted Rand index (ARI) of 0.7951, comparable to Genie at 0.7941 and higher than the other evaluated baselines. Empirical training time and GPU memory scaled approximately linearly from 5,000 to 100,000 nodes. Learned transition rules also transferred from smaller source graphs to independent 100,000-node samples generated under matched conditions. These results demonstrate a recurrent graph-clustering formulation while identifying dependencies on graph quality, readout design, and source-target similarity.

Keith Miller, Tristan Crawford

Image Clustering

Ask PDF

Jul 9, 2026cs.LG

Dimensionality Reduction Meets Network Science: Sensemaking on UMAP's kNN Graph

While UMAP is widely used for exploring high-dimensional data, typical workflows focus on its lower-dimensional embedding, largely overlooking the rich k-nearest-neighbor (kNN) graph that UMAP constructs internally. This graph encodes the data manifold in its original high-dimensional space, before the distortion that UMAP's 2D projection introduces. We demonstrate the untapped potential of this internal representation, showing how standard graph algorithms applied to this graph enhance data sensemaking: (1) PageRank identifies representative data points, (2) k-core decomposition reveals dense core regions versus sparse periphery, and (3) clustering coefficient detects tight-knit neighborhoods with highly-similar data points. Through quantitative and qualitative evaluation on MNIST and Fashion MNIST, we show that these graph-based analyses are not only practical but also competitive with or complementary to purpose-built methods (e.g., k-medoids for exemplar selection, HDBSCAN for density-based clustering).

Duen Horng Chau, Donghao Ren, Fred Hohman +1

Dimensionality Reduction High-Dimensional Data Graph Representation Learning Approximate Nearest-Neighbor Search Graph Representations Complex Networks+1

Ask PDF

May 7, 2026cs.LG

Diversity Curves for Graph Representation Learning

Graph-level representations are crucial tools for characterising structural differences between graphs. However, comparing graphs with different cardinalities, even when sampled from the same underlying distribution, remains challenging. Unsupervised tasks in particular require interpretable, scalable, and reliable size-aware graph representations. Our work addresses these issues by tracking the structural diversity of a graph across coarsening levels. The resulting graph embeddings, which we denote diversity curves, are interpretable by construction, efficient, and directly comparable across coarsening hierarchies. Specifically, we track the spread of graphs, a novel isometry invariant that is inherently well-suited for encoding the metric diversity and geometry of graphs. We utilise edge contraction coarsening and prove that this improves expressivity, thus leading to more powerful graph-level representations than structural descriptors alone. Demonstrating their utility over a range of baseline methods in practice, we use diversity curves to (i) cluster and visualise simulated graphs across varying sizes, (ii) distinguish the geometry of single-cell graphs, (iii) compare the structure of molecular graph datasets, and (iv) characterise geometric shapes.

Katharina Limbeck, Nadja Häusermann, Martin Carrasco +2

Graph Representation Learning Diversity Representation Learning

Ask PDF