Extending Pretrained 10-Second ECG Foundation Models to Longer Horizons

Specialized foundation models are beginning to emerge in various medical subdomains, but pretraining methodologies and parametric scaling with the size of the pretraining dataset are rarely assessed systematically and in a like-for-like manner. This work focuses on foundation models for electrocardiography (ECG) data, one of the most widely captured physiological time series world-wide. We present a comprehensive assessment of pretraining methodologies, covering five different contrastive and non-contrastive self-supervised learning objectives for ECG foundation models, and investigate their scaling behavior with pretraining dataset sizes up to 11M input samples, exclusively from publicly available sources. Pretraining strategy has a meaningful and consistent impact on downstream performance, with contrastive predictive coding (slightly ahead of JEPA) yielding the most transferable representations across diverse clinical tasks. Scaling pretraining data continues to yield meaningful improvements up to 11M samples for most objectives. We also compare model architectures across all pretraining methodologies and find evidence for a clear superiority of structured state space models compared to transformers and CNN models. We hypothesize that the strong inductive biases of structured state space models, rather than pretraining scale alone, are the primary driver of effective ECG representation learning, with important implications for future foundation model development in this and potentially other physiological signal domains.

Self-supervised electrocardiogram (ECG) models are often trained on a few seconds of ECG signal and, increasingly, on discretized token sequences. It remains unclear whether these choices sacrifice information needed for rhythm inference and longitudinal consistency in real-world ambulatory recordings. We present a controlled study on the Icentia11k single-lead dataset that varies (i) the input horizon (16 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes) and (ii) the front-end representation (continuous convolutional patch embeddings vs. fixed vector-quantized tokens), while holding the Transformer backbone and training protocol constant. Representations are assessed by downstream abnormal rhythm detection and by patient-level retrieval that probes cross-session stability. Our results show that increasing temporal context beyond 16-second snapshots yields stronger transfer and higher retrieval accuracy, with the strongest performance achieved by the 5- and 10-minute models, indicating improved capture of slow-varying rhythm dynamics and individual-specific structure. Across all evaluated horizons, continuous patch embeddings outperform discretized tokens, suggesting that quantization can discard clinically relevant waveform detail. These findings motivate ECG foundation models that emphasize extended context and continuous encoders for clinical prediction and similarity-based applications. Our code and pretrained models are publicly available at https://github.com/muha-0/ecg-ssl-representation-learning.

While scaling laws have established a fundamental framework for foundation models in natural language processing, their applicability to electrocardiogram (ECG) models remains poorly characterized. Indeed, recent studies do not always yield consistent downstream gains as one increases the model size or pre-training dataset size of ECG models, leaving the exact roles of architectural inductive biases, pre-training paradigms, and expected improvements with size largely unanswered. In this work, we systematically investigate neural and loss-to-loss scaling laws within the ECG domain. By pre-training over $120$ models (ranging from $20$K to $200$M parameters) on the large-scale CODE dataset ($2.3$M records), we decouple the effects of model architecture (ResNet vs. Transformer) and pre-training paradigm, namely supervised learning (SL) versus self-supervised learning (SSL). We found that (i) SL models are data-bottlenecked in-distribution, whereas SSL models scale robustly across both model and data sizes; (ii) for out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, ResNets are $1.3$ to $2.5$ times more parameter-efficient than Transformers, while SSL is up to $16$ times more data-efficient and achieves up to $7.6$ times higher transfer efficiency than SL on unseen clinical tasks; (iii) across the observed scales, ResNet-based models generally achieve the lowest OOD loss, with SSL dominating on unseen clinical tasks and self-supervised Transformers overtaking at very large model sizes. Our results suggest that the path to effective ECG foundation models lies in the strategic alignment of architecture and paradigm rather than brute-force scaling.