The design of modern neural architectures has converged through incremental empirical choices, yet the mechanisms governing their training dynamics remain only partially understood. We identify and analyze a negative weight drift induced by the interaction between standard losses and positively biased activation functions. We prove that under MSE or cross-entropy loss, the gradient with respect to positive pre-activations is non-negative in expectation at initialization, driving downstream weights toward negative values during early training. The drift is intrinsic to optimization rather than data, and persists across architectures (MLP, ResNet, ViT, GPT-nano, MP-SENe) and asymmetric activation functions (ReLU, GELU, SiLU). Coupled with ReLU, weight drift produces activation sparsity reaching up to 90% in GPT-nano. We characterize the sparsity-accuracy tradeoff across 79 configurations and identify a sharp accuracy cliff above ∼70% activation sparsity. While ReLU2 achieves a good sparsity--accuracy ratio in GPT-nano, it pathologically amplifies identified activation spikes in intermediate transformer layers. Clipping resolves this while preserving the representational benefits of squaring: clipped ReLU2 outperforms its unclipped version, and GELU2 achieves the lowest validation loss on GPT-nano. Code is available at https://github.com/On-Point-RND/BugOrFeature.
Most explanations of training instability focus on \emph{learning-rate criticality}, typically characterized by the Edge of Stability, beyond which optimization becomes unstable. We argue that, in practical deep neural network training, there is an additional and often overlooked \emph{weight-norm criticality}. This criticality is induced by the interaction between normalization (which introduces scale-invariant components) and weight decay (which persistently shrinks parameter norms). As the weight decay coefficient increases, the norms of scale-invariant weights are progressively driven toward zero. Meanwhile, the sharpness of the loss landscape increases rapidly, destabilizing the optimization dynamics and resulting in abrupt loss spikes. This perspective provides a rationale for why weight penalties can improve generalization yet cannot be made arbitrarily strong: excessive decay drives scale-invariant weight norms past a critical boundary and destabilizes training. Our work provides a new mechanistic understanding of loss spikes through the lens of \emph{weight-norm criticality}. Moreover, \emph{weight-norm criticality} yields testable predictions that we validate empirically in networks with scale-invariant components, providing empirical support for the proposed mechanism.
Deep neural networks exhibit periodic loss spikes during unregularized long-term training, a phenomenon known as the "Slingshot Mechanism." Existing work usually attributes this to intrinsic optimization dynamics, but its triggering mechanism remains unclear. This paper proves that this phenomenon is a result of floating-point arithmetic precision limits. As training enters a high-confidence stage, the difference between the correct-class logit and the other logits may exceed the absorption-error threshold. Then during backpropagation, the gradient of the correct class is rounded exactly to zero, while the gradients of the incorrect classes remain nonzero. This breaks the zero-sum constraint of gradients across classes and introduces a systematic drift in the parameter update of the classifier layer. We prove that this drift forms a positive feedback loop with the feature, causing the global classifier mean and the global feature mean to grow exponentially. We call this mechanism Numerical Feature Inflation (NFI). This mechanism explains the rapid norm growth before a Slingshot spike, the subsequent reappearance of gradients, and the resulting loss spike. We further show that NFI is not equivalent to an observed loss spike: in more practical tasks, partial absorption may not produce visible spikes, but it can still break the zero-sum constraint and drive rapid growth of parameter norms. Our results reinterpret Slingshot as a numerical dynamic of finite-precision training, and provide a testable explanation for abnormal parameter growth and logit divergence in late-stage training.
The observation that activation sparsity emerges in MLP blocks of standardly trained Transformers offers an opportunity to drastically reduce computation costs without sacrificing performance. To theoretically explain this phenomenon, existing works have shown that activation sparsity does not result from the data properties or data fitting but from the implicit bias of the training process. However, these connections are obtained with strong assumptions, which cannot be applied to deep models standardly trained with a large number of steps. Different from these works, we find that the flatness of loss landscapes is also closely related to the MLP activation sparsity and can serve as a weaker and naturally emerging assumption standard deep networks. Specifically, we find that 1) the MLP activation sparsity equals a ratio between "augmented flatness" (a weighted sum of flatness measures) and the product of the input norm and activation gradient of the MLP. We empirically find that this ratio decreases during training, leading to sparse activations. 2) We also propose the notion of derivative sparsity, which reduces to activation sparsity under ReLU, but further enables pruning in the backward propagation and is more stable than activation sparsity. With the theoretical findings, we can further encourage activation sparsity by decreasing the numerator and increasing the denominator of the ratio using three methods. These plug-and-play modifications can effectively reduce the ratio and produce sparser activations. Experiments on ImageNet-1K and C4 demonstrate relative improvements of at least 36% on inference sparsity and at least 50% on training sparsity over vanilla Transformers, indicating further potential cost reduction in both inference and training