cs.GTMay 18, 2026

Nash Welfare in Additively Separable Hedonic Games

Authors: Marta PaganoAlexander Schlenga

Organizations: Sapienza University of Rome, Italy · Technical University of Munich, Germany

Abstract

Additively separable hedonic games (ASHGs) are a prominent model of coalition formation where agents' preferences are derived from their individual valuations of peers. While social welfare maximization in ASHGs has traditionally focused mostly on utilitarian welfare, Nash welfare -- a well-established metric in economics which balances fairness with efficiency and offers scale invariance -- has been entirely overlooked. In this paper, we initiate the study of Nash welfare in ASHGs. We point out desirable properties fulfilled by partitions with high Nash welfare. This includes guaranteed contractual Nash stability in symmetric games, even for any approximation of Nash welfare. This is particularly appealing since, as for other welfare notions, Nash welfare turns out to be NP-hard to maximize, even for the ASHG subclass of symmetric aversion to enemies games (AEGs). A main focus of our study is on approximation algorithms for the Nash welfare objective. We present packing-based algorithms with approximation ratios for well-established subclasses of ASHGs: n1n-1 for AEGs and 2n2n for appreciation of friends games. This is complemented by a strict inapproximability result showing it is NP-hard to approximate Nash welfare within a factor of 1.00007591.0000759 in general ASHGs. Further, we investigate the restricted settings with an upper bound on the coalition size or number of coalitions, and draw the boundary between the cases admitting efficient algorithms and those yielding NP-hardness: bounding the allowed size or number of coalitions by 22 admits polynomial-time solvability, whereas bounds of 33 or more yield NP-hardness or unbounded inapproximability.

Explore similar work

Sep 3, 2026cs.GT

EF1-Constrained Nash Social Welfare with Identical Additive Valuations: Complexity, Guarantees, and Experiments

We study the allocation of indivisible goods among agents with identical additive valuations, focusing on envy-freeness up to one good (EF1) and Nash social welfare (NSW). Since every maximum-NSW allocation is EF1 under additive valuations, the associated threshold problem inherits the known strong NP-hardness of NSW maximization under identical additive valuations and is strongly NP-complete. We therefore focus on welfare guarantees satisfied by arbitrary EF1 allocations. Although every such allocation is known to achieve an e1/ee^{-1/e}-approximation to the unrestricted optimal NSW, we identify conditions yielding stronger guarantees. Under uniform valuations, every EF1 allocation is NSW-optimal. Under an ε\varepsilon-small-item condition, every EF1 allocation achieves an explicit approximation ratio ρn(ε)ρ_n(\varepsilon) satisfying ρn(ε)=1O(ε2)ρ_n(\varepsilon) = 1-O(\varepsilon^2) as ε0\varepsilon\to 0 for fixed nn. We further consider the stronger sequential requirement that EF1\operatorname{EF1} be maintained after every item assignment. For this setting, we introduce \emph{PriorityNet}, a deep reinforcement learning framework trained with Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and equipped with prospective EF1\operatorname{EF1} action masking, which guarantees prefix-wise EF1\operatorname{EF1} by construction. Across 3,000 test instances in each of the offline full-information and random-order online regimes (n[2,20]n\in[2,20], m[5,100]m\in[5,100]), PriorityNet achieves mean normalized NSW\operatorname{NSW} values of 0.99110.9911 and 0.97010.9701, respectively. Relative to the offline Longest Processing Time (LPT) heuristic and the online least-valued-bundle rule, it attains instance-wise win-minus-loss rates of +27.10%+27.10\% and +17.87%+17.87\%. Its aggregate welfare matches the offline LPT baseline to four decimal places and modestly improves upon the online baseline, from 0.96940.9694 to 0.97010.9701.
Zih-Sian Yang, Yi-Hao Chen, Yu-Te Kuan +3
Apr 18, 2026cs.GT

From Necklaces to Coalitions: Fair and Self-Interested Distribution of Coalition Value Calculations

A key challenge in distributed coalition formation within characteristic function games is determining how to allocate the calculation of coalition values across a set of agents. The number of possible coalitions grows exponentially with the number of agents, and existing distributed approaches may produce uneven or redundant allocations, or assign coalitions to agents that are not themselves members. In this article, we present the \emph{Necklace-based Distributed Coalition Algorithm} (N-DCA), a communication-free algorithm in which each agent independently determines its own coalition value calculation allocation using only its identifier and the total number of agents. The approach builds on the notion of Increment Arrays (IAs), for which we develop a complete mathematical framework: equivalence classes under circular shifts, periodic IAs, and a rotated designation scheme with formal load-balance guarantees (tight bounds). We establish a bijection between canonical representative IAs and two-colour combinatorial necklaces, enabling the use of efficient necklace generation algorithms to enumerate allocations in constant amortised time. N-DCA is, to the best of our knowledge, the only distributed coalition value calculation algorithm for unrestricted characteristic function games to provably satisfy five desirable properties: no inter-agent communication, equitable allocation, no redundancy, balanced load, and self-interest. An empirical evaluation against DCVC (Rahwan and Jennings 2007) demonstrates that, although DCVC is faster by a constant factor, this difference becomes negligible under realistic characteristic-function evaluation costs, while N-DCA offers advantages in working memory, scalability, and the self-interest guarantee.
Terry R. Payne, Luke Riley
Jun 18, 2026cs.GT

Equilibrium with Internal Transfers

Nash equilibrium (NE) arises from selfish utility maximization, yet its social welfare can be arbitrarily far from optimal. Moreover, computing an NE is intractable in general. We study augmented game models in which players use budget-balanced internal transfers to improve incentives before play. We first introduce \emph{Self-Enforcing Transfer Equilibrium} (SETE), where players commit to nonnegative peer-to-peer transfers that are paid only if the recipient does not deviate from a prescribed strategy. For polymatrix games, we show that every stationary point of the social welfare function, in particular any socially optimal strategy profile, can be sustained as a SETE. This induces a Nash equilibrium in the agent normal form of the corresponding augmented game. We further propose a polynomial-time algorithm and a decentralized learning dynamic to compute such product-form equilibria. We then introduce \emph{Mediated Self-Enforcing Transfer Equilibrium} (M-SETE), where a mediator makes both the payment schedule and the prescribed strategies binding offers. This additional enforcement resolves the agent-normal-form limitation: an M-SETE is a Nash equilibrium of the augmented game itself, not merely of its agent normal form, and any socially optimal strategy profile can be supported as an M-SETE in any finite game while preserving budget balance. Thus, internal transfers improve welfare and computation while preserving independent play on the equilibrium path. When full sequential-game stability is required, binding mediation provides the corresponding implementation.
Mingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman Ozdaglar