Physics-informed convolutional neural networks for fluid flow through porous media

While Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) offer a mesh-free approach to solving fluid-flow PDEs, standard point-wise residual minimization suffers from convergence pathologies in topologically complex domains like Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS). The locality bias of point-wise constraints fails to propagate global information through tortuous channels, causing unstable gradients and conservation violations. To address this, we propose the Multi-scale Weak-form PINN (MUSA-PINN), which reformulates Navier-Stokes equation constraints as integral conservation laws over hierarchical spherical control volumes. We enforce continuity and momentum conservation via flux-balance residuals on control surfaces. Our method utilizes a three-scale subdomain strategy-comprising large volumes for long-range coupling, skeleton-aware meso-scale volumes aligned with transport pathways, and small volumes for local refinement-alongside a two-stage training schedule prioritizing continuity. Experiments on steady incompressible flow in TPMS geometries show MUSA-PINN outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, reducing relative errors by up to 93% and preserving mass conservation.

In this work, viscous fluid flow governed by the Stokes equations in highly perforated domains is studied using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). Perforated microstructures induce complex boundary conditions and fine-scale flow features that are difficult for standard neural networks to resolve. Conventional PINNs, even when combined with advanced training techniques, can suffer from a loss of accuracy and efficiency as the number of perforations increases. One important source of this difficulty is the soft enforcement of boundary conditions through penalty terms, which can lead to stiffness, gradient conflicts, and poor resolution of near-boundary flow structures. Hard constraints provide an alternative by encoding boundary conditions exactly into the network ansatz, but may introduce undesirable non-local effects due to the global nature of the approximation. To address these challenges, finite basis PINNs (FBPINNs), which are based on domain decomposition and localisation principles, are used together with hard boundary constraints that efficiently encode perforation-related boundary conditions. This approach helps mitigate spectral bias, improves overall accuracy, and exhibits convergence that is only weakly affected by the number of perforations, thereby providing an efficient and highly parallelisable neural network framework. The proposed approach is further supported with theoretical arguments, specifically focusing on the localisation and approximation properties of FBPINNs.

Modelling rock-fluid interaction requires solving a set of partial differential equations (PDEs) to predict the flow behaviour and the reactions of the fluid with the rock on the interfaces. Conventional high-fidelity numerical models require a high resolution to obtain reliable results, resulting in huge computational expense. This restricts the applicability of these models for multi-query problems, such as uncertainty quantification and optimisation, which require running numerous scenarios. As a cheaper alternative to high-fidelity models, this work develops eight surrogate models for predicting the fluid flow in porous media. Four of these are reduced-order models (ROM) based on one neural network for compression and another for prediction. The other four are single neural networks with the property of grid-size invariance; a term which we use to refer to image-to-image models that are capable of inferring on computational domains that are larger than those used during training. In addition to the novel grid-size-invariant framework for surrogate models, we compare the predictive performance of UNet and UNet++ architectures, and demonstrate that UNet++ outperforms UNet for surrogate models. Furthermore, we show that the grid-size-invariant approach is a reliable way to reduce memory consumption during training, resulting in good correlation between predicted and ground-truth values and outperforming the ROMs analysed. The application analysed is particularly challenging because fluid-induced rock dissolution results in a non-static solid field and, consequently, it cannot be used to help in adjustments of the future prediction.