Extracting structured information from visual documents (Visual Information Extraction, VIE) is a cornerstone of business automation. While recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising capabilities, existing benchmarks suffer from critical limitations in scale and realism, lack semantic granularity, and fail to cover diverse document types. To bridge this gap, we introduce ReceiptBench, a large-scale, human-annotated benchmark consisting of 10k diverse receipts, organizing information extraction into four hierarchical sub-tasks: (1) Basic Perception for raw text spotting, (2) Format Normalization for strictly following standardization instructions, (3) Semantic Reasoning for inferring implicit attributes from context, and (4) Structure Parsing for handling nested line items. Furthermore, we propose a two-stage training framework incorporating Metric-Aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO), which translates rigorous evaluation constraints into reinforcement learning signals to enhance structural consistency. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method yields state-of-the-art performance, surpassing leading proprietary models on complex reasoning tasks. We release our datasets and code at https://github.com/wwwT0ri/ReceiptBench.
Visual information extraction (VIE) from visually rich documents remains challenging due to high layout variability and real-world impairments. Existing methods typically rely on sequential OCR pipelines or end-to-end models requiring extensive labeled data and layout-specific training, limiting their scalability.We propose a classification-guided large vision-language model (LVLM) framework for multi-type VIE that achieves high accuracy with minimal supervision. The approach decouples document-type classification from content extraction and employs in-context learning (ICL)-based dynamic prompt engineering to inject task-specific knowledge, enabling robust zero-shot inference across diverse layouts. From a theoretical perspective, the proposed method can be viewed as a form of conditional computation that reduces task uncertainty and improves information efficiency during prompt-based inference. Evaluated on a real-world bidding dataset with 16 certificate types, our zero-shot method (based on Qwen2.5-VL-7B) outperforms a strong supervised baseline by 18.35 percentage points in F1-score (86.43% vs. 68.08%) and 0.23 in normalized edit distance (0.90 vs. 0.67). Optional domain-specific fine-tuning further improves performance to 93.65% F1 and 0.93 NED, demonstrating superior robustness against seals, watermarks, and low contrast. The framework offers an efficient, scalable solution for complex document understanding in office automation. Code is available at https://github.com/FairmeHIT/Multi-VIE, and fine-tuned models at https://huggingface.co/fairme/Qwen2.5-VL-7B-SFT.
Recent multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on visual reasoning benchmarks, yet it remains unclear to what extent such performance reflects reasoning directly grounded in visual evidence. We introduce VisReason, a benchmark for vision-centric reasoning in everyday scenarios where perception and inference are tightly coupled. VisReason contains 1,505 questions across 10 categories spanning perceptual, structural, and conceptual reasoning. Our evaluation shows that VisReason poses a qualitatively different challenge from existing benchmarks, exposing substantial gaps between humans and current MLLMs and revealing limited benefits from test-time reasoning strategies. VisReason offers a focused diagnostic for evaluating vision-centric reasoning beyond language.
Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to extract structured fields from business documents, yet most evaluations report accuracy on clean benchmarks and offer little guidance to practitioners choosing an approach for a given task complexity. We address this gap with a measurement-grounded study and an open-source release. Across eleven systems (three commercial, two reasoning, five open-source VLMs in pretrained and fine-tuned form, and a non-LLM OCR->regex floor) scored on a 750-document held-out pool of synthetic checks, fine-tuning on 3K samples lifts the best open-source VLMs above F1 0.98-above every zero-shot commercial system on this task-while GPT-5 leads the commercial pool on F1 and Claude Sonnet 4.5 collapses on Date. To turn these measurements into actionable choices, we introduce a practitioner-oriented selection framework that maps a task profile (quality, latency, governance, volume) to a recommended approach via filtering and total-cost minimization, illustrated on a hypothetical mid-volume document-extraction scenario.