Characterizing the Representational Capacity of Neural Processes

Modeling unknown latent functions from finite, irregularly sampled measurements is a recurring challenge across science and engineering. Neural processes (NPs), a family of probabilistic functional models, are promising solutions -- especially when endowed with domain-specific symmetries like translation equivariance, which improve sample efficiency and generalization. Yet existing translation-equivariant NPs face two limitations: (i) they stack generic components with non-linearities, obscuring the induced function class and limiting interpretability; and (ii) convolutional designs are limited by local receptive fields and the need to embed inputs onto a dense uniform grid, while attention-based alternatives lift these restrictions at quadratic cost in the number of observations. We address both with two contributions. First, using the Volterra expansion, we approximate continuous translation-equivariant operators by sums of higher-order convolutions, yielding analytical transparency while admitting efficient evaluation via first-order convolutions. Second, we introduce set Fourier convolutions (SFConvs), a frequency-domain parameterization that operates directly on irregularly sampled points, achieves approximately global receptive fields, and scales linearly in the number of observations. Building on these ideas, we propose two conditional NPs (CNPs): SFConvCNPs, which stack SFConv blocks with non-linearities, and SFVConvCNPs, which integrate the Volterra formulation. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate our methods' efficacy against state-of-the-art baselines.

Model dimension ($d_{model}$) is a fundamental hyperparameter in transformer language models, yet its role in setting the geometric limits of feature representation remains under-explored. Grounded in the Linear Representation and Superposition Hypotheses - which propose that models encode features as near-orthogonal directions in latent space - we develop a framework for estimating how many such directions a model can support. We first establish the embedding matrix as a measurable proxy for near-orthogonality constraints across the latent space: the boundary between meaningful token relationships and incidental similarity in the pairwise cosine similarity distribution gives a concrete estimate of the model's accepted deviation $\varepsilon$ from perfect orthogonality. Applying this metric across dozens of open-source models reveals two classes: models with high $\varepsilon$ whose embeddings lack near-orthogonal structure, and models with low $\varepsilon$ that maintain it. We then show that the standard Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma greatly underestimates the packing efficiency of trained representations, and derive an adjusted capacity formula in which the number of near-orthogonal directions depends on the ratio of vectors to dimensions ($k/d$) rather than the raw count - a single modification that cuts prediction error by two orders of magnitude with no extra parameters. Combining these results, we define representational capacity as an upper bound on the number of distinguishable directions available for features and embeddings in a model's latent space. Capacity is exponentially sensitive to $\varepsilon$, and larger models favor tighter orthogonality constraints over maximizing raw capacity - a pattern compatible with several explanations (a stability-capacity trade-off, a ceiling on usable concepts, or confounds with model scale) that we leave to future work.

The quadratic scaling of Transformer self-attention has driven the adoption of sub-quadratic Selective State Space Models (SSMs) like Mamba, which compress past context into a fixed-size recurrent hidden state. This strict informational bottleneck raises a foundational question for mechanistic interpretability: do SSMs and Transformers learn fundamentally distinct latent representations? In this work, we employ Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) to conduct a large-scale, feature-level correspondence analysis between Mamba-130m and Pythia-70m over a 10-million token corpus. Contrary to hypotheses predicting widespread architectural divergence, we find no evidence of systematic representational divergence between architectures: across the observed Jaccard distribution, 99.98% of Mamba features cluster toward the upper alignment boundary, providing preliminary feature-level support for the Universality Hypothesis. We further identify and qualitatively characterize this microscopic fraction (0.02%) of diverging features, finding patterns consistent with the hypothesis that the recurrent bottleneck selectively limits the parsing of rigid syntax rather than broad semantic ontology. We demonstrate that while Pythia's unconstrained attention permits the monosemantic decomposition of distinct formatting edge-cases, Mamba is forced to compress unrelated syntactical anomalies into polysemantic "junk drawer" neurons to preserve state capacity. Collectively, these results suggest that architectural routing mechanisms may have negligible impact on core semantic understanding, with representational divergence confined to extreme structural margins.