World Models as Group Actions

Camera-conditioned world models generate interactive videos in which commanded actions should induce the expected scene changes while appearance, geometry, and temporal dynamics remain coherent. Existing rewards assess these requirements separately: geometry-based rewards estimate trajectory execution but cannot judge the visual quality of the executed motion, whereas image-based rewards measure frame quality without capturing action execution or temporal dynamics. We posit that a vision-language model (VLM) offers a shared reasoning space for relating actions to their visual outcomes. However, judging a complete long video against its full action sequence creates a lengthy, noisy context in which short-lived local action evidence can be missed or diluted. We present WorldReward, a VLM-based pairwise preference reward model that unifies action-consistency and visual-quality evaluation for camera-conditioned world models. WorldReward decomposes paired videos into action-aligned chunks, organizes each chunk into structured visual evidence, and aggregates chunk-level decisions by voting into separate video-level action and visual-quality preferences. To train it, we construct a large-scale reasoning-augmented preference dataset using structured judgments generated by a frontier VLM and refined through tool-based agent auditing and targeted human review. We further introduce WorldReward-Bench, a human-annotated benchmark measuring reward-model agreement with human preferences across action consistency, appearance quality, and motion quality. WorldReward achieves the highest agreement on all three dimensions, exceeding GPT-5.5 by 3.42, 1.45, and 3.56 percentage points, respectively. When used for RL post-training of HY-WorldPlay 1.5, it consistently improves both action execution and visual quality across short- to long-term horizons.

Video world models are increasingly used to provide predictive visual representations, yet it remains unclear which pretraining signals induce action-relevant structure in their latent spaces. We study this question through a unified probe-based evaluation across diverse encoder families, including image-only self-supervision, video pretraining with and without latent prediction, reconstruction-based autoencoders, diffusion models, and shortcut-forcing dynamics models. Using a common inverse-dynamics probing objective, we find that action-relevant structure is driven primarily by temporal video pretraining rather than pixel reconstruction fidelity: models with strong pixel decoding quality can exhibit near-zero action recoverability, while video-pretrained self-supervised encoders consistently achieve the best Pareto trade-off between visual fidelity and action prediction. Comparing V-JEPA and VideoMAE further shows that most gains arise from natural-video temporal context, with feature-level latent prediction providing a smaller additional benefit. These trends transfer across robotic benchmarks, though CALVIN reveals that static-environment tasks can partially mask the importance of temporal structure by allowing strong image priors to suffice. Finally, inverse-dynamics supervision substantially improves robustness to visual corruption, suggesting that action-aware objectives regularize latent geometry beyond clean-setting performance. Our results identify temporal predictive structure -- not reconstruction fidelity -- as the primary ingredient underlying action-relevant video representations.

Video world models simulate future states conditioned on current observations and user actions. Recent systems have demonstrated impressive video consistency and action controllability over long sequences. However, fairly comparing these interactive models remains challenging. In practice, a human player typically evaluates a world model by pursuing long-horizon objectives through interaction. For example, a user may turn around 360 degrees to see whether the environment remains consistent, or walk into the water and inspect whether realistic water ripples are generated. The action sequence required to achieve the same objective may vary substantially between models, making fixed action-conditioned evaluation unsuitable for cross-model comparison. To address this, we employ multi-modal Agent Players to interact with world models toward specified long-horizon objectives. Building on this paradigm, we introduce PlayWorld, a benchmark providing 171 scenarios, each with a specified objective. To evaluate performance thoroughly, we assess models along four core dimensions: geometry consistency, interaction fidelity, out-of-sight evolution, and insight evolution. In addition, we incorporate basic ability metrics for video quality and controllability. Experiments across nine state-of-the-art world models reveal that current models remain unreliable on long-horizon interactive objectives, particularly in maintaining spatial consistency and persistent state evolution. Code and data are available at https://github.com/kxding/PlayWorld.