Abstract
A robot resolving ``put the cup on that one'' must fuse gesture, language, and scene geometry, yet 3D grounding benchmarks only partially capture this regime: descriptions are written post-hoc, gestures are templated, or pointing is staged for the camera. MM-Conv captures natural co-speech gesture from dyadic VR interaction alongside full-body motion capture and 3D scene graphs. We use it to evaluate pose-language fusion with a decoupled late-fusion architecture in which pose and text pathways share no learned parameters. The two choices together make category, pose, and text contributions easier to isolate through controlled ablations. Fusion with frozen MiniLM category embeddings exceeds pose alone and the best text-only pathway on every reference type, reaching 31.9% top-1. The learned scalar gate flips between opposing policies depending on whether the text pathway has category access. This is a reliability diagnostic: fusion-accuracy claims for semantic grounding systems are indistinguishable from category-representation artifacts unless pathways are architecturally decoupled.
Explore similar work
May 20, 2026cs.CV
Grounding language in the physical world requires AI systems to interpret references that emerge dynamically during conversation. While current vision-language models (VLMs) excel at static image tasks, they struggle to resolve ambiguous expressions in spontaneous, multi-turn dialogue. We address this gap by introducing (1) a benchmark for referential communication in dynamic 3D environments, built from 6.7 hours of egocentric VR interaction with synchronized speech, motion, gaze, and 3D scene geometry, and (2) a two-stage grounding pipeline that explicitly resolves conversational ambiguity before visual localization. The benchmark includes over 4,200 manually verified referring expressions spanning full, partitive, and pronominal types. Our contextual rewriting approach improves grounding performance by 11-22 percentage points on average, with a pure detector (GroundingDINO) reaching 56.7% on pronominals after rewriting, nearly double the best end-to-end baseline. Results demonstrate that decoupling linguistic reasoning from visual perception is more effective than end-to-end approaches for conversational grounding.
Anna Deichler, Jim O'Regan, Fethiye Irmak Dogan +4
Jun 28, 2026cs.CV
Visual grounding aims to associate free-form textual queries with specific regions in an image. While recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated promising capabilities in this domain, they primarily excel at object-level grounding and often struggle with part-level grounding-an essential requirement for fine-grained tasks such as robotic manipulation. In this work, we introduce a general approach that equips any open-source MLLMs with accurate 2D part-level point grounding, offering a more direct alternative to conventional grounding representations. Our method leverages the attention mechanisms inherently present in MLLMs. By synthesizing text-conditioned, grounding-aware queries within intermediate layers via the proposed Q-Synth Module, we capture target-relevant attention patterns and refine them with a lightweight Attention-to-Point Decoder, which converts these patterns into a point-centric heatmap for final prediction. Notably, all original MLLM parameters are frozen, ensuring full preservation of their pre-trained capabilities. Experiments show that our design consistently improves part-level grounding accuracy across datasets and can be seamlessly integrated into any open-source MLLMs.
Jin-Cheng Jhang, Fu-En Wang, Xin Yang +4
Jun 7, 2026cs.RO
Robots deployed in human-centric environments routinely receive natural-language descriptions of spatial information ("I left my backpack on the table") that reference parts of the world beyond their perceptual field of view. Traditional metric-semantic mapping ignores this signal, while off-the-shelf multimodal models remain limited in 3D spatial reasoning and are not directly amenable to fusion with other sensor modalities. To convert language observations into a calibrated spatial distribution, we train a Language Sensor Model (LSM) that maps each utterance and its scene-graph context to a multimodal distribution, with mixture weights encoding referential ambiguity (e.g., "which table") and component covariances encoding spatial uncertainty (e.g., where "on the table" the target lies). We then introduce VL-Map (Vision-Language Metric-Semantic Mapping), a probabilistic framework that treats these language predictions as stochastic observations and fuses them with onboard perception within a unified belief map. On the VLA-3D benchmark as well as on a real-world mobile robot, LSM is the only language predictor whose covariance estimates remain within the calibrated regime; fused into VL-Map, it leads to more accurate predictions of the target object location (~70% more probability mass on the true target compared to the strongest foundation-model baseline).
Aryan Naveen, Jason Xinyu Liu, Luca Carlone +1