stat.APMay 24, 2026

Rejoinder: The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review

Authors: Buxin SuJiayao ZhangNatalie CollinaYuling YanDidong LiKyunghyun ChoJianqing FanAaron Roth+1 more

Organizations: *University of Pennsylvania. · †University of Wisconsin–Madison. · ‡Associate Chair of ICML 2023. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. · §Program Chair of ICML 2023. New York University. · ¶Princeton University.

Abstract

This article is the rejoinder to ``The ICML 2023 Ranking Experiment: Examining Author Self-Assessment in ML/AI Peer Review,'' to appear in the Journal of the American Statistical Association with discussion. To address the practical and theoretical points raised by the discussants, we organize our response around four core themes: (i) formulating peer review as a statistical estimation problem; (ii) mitigating equity and strategic concerns in the deployment of the Isotonic Mechanism; (iii) incorporating complementary signals such as reviewer rankings and structured metadata; and (iv) exploring a human-centered framework for peer review in the era of generative AI.

Explore similar work

CardsList