PDEInvBench: A Comprehensive Dataset and Design Space Exploration of Neural Networks for PDE Inverse Problems

Divyam Goel; Nithin Chalapathi; Sanjeev Raja; Aditi S. Krishnapriyan

cs.LGMay 25, 2026

PDEInvBench: A Comprehensive Dataset and Design Space Exploration of Neural Networks for PDE Inverse Problems

Authors: Divyam Goel, Nithin Chalapathi, Sanjeev Raja, Aditi S. Krishnapriyan

Organizations: Department of Computer Science, UC Berkeley · Departments of Computer Science and Chemical EngineeringMay UC Berkeley; LBNL

Abstract

Inverse problems in partial differential equations (PDEs) involve estimating the physical parameters of a system from observed spatiotemporal solution fields. Neural networks are well-suited for PDE parameter estimation due to their capability to model function-to-function space transformations. While existing benchmarks of machine learning methods for PDEs primarily focus on the forward problem, there are no similar comprehensive studies and benchmark datasets on PDE inverse problems, i.e., mapping solution fields to underlying physical parameters. We fill this gap by introducing PDEInvBench, a comprehensive benchmark dataset consisting of numerical simulations for both time-dependent and time-independent PDEs across a wide range of physical behaviors and parameters. Our dataset includes evaluation splits that assess performance in both in-distribution and various out-of-distribution settings. Using our benchmark dataset, we comprehensively explore the design space of neural networks for PDE inverse problems along three key dimensions: (1) optimization procedures, analyzing the role of supervised, self-supervised, and test-time training objectives on performance, (2) problem representations, where we study the value of architectural choices with different inductive biases and various conditioning strategies, and (3) scaling, which we perform with respect to both model and data size. Our experiments reveal several practical insights: 1) neural networks perform best with a two-stage training procedure: initial supervision with PDE parameters followed by test-time fine-tuning using the PDE residual, 2) incorporating PDE derivatives as input features consistently improves accuracy, and 3) increasing the diversity of initial conditions in the training data yields greater performance gains than expanding the range of PDE parameters. We make our dataset and codebase publicly available.

Explore similar work

Jun 10, 2026math.NA

Adjoint Method versus Physics-Informed Neural Networks in PDE-Constrained Inverse Problems

Inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to computational mechanics and are commonly solved by adjoint-based optimization, while physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible alternative. Their relative performance remains difficult to assess because the two approaches are often compared under different formulations, parameterizations, optimizers, and regularization choices. We present a fair comparison of adjoint optimization and PINNs for PDE-constrained inverse problems. From a common abstract formulation, we instantiate both methods on identical domains, governing equations, observation models, and regularization terms, while matching the optimizer, unknown parameterization, and arithmetic precision wherever applicable. The benchmarks include unsteady Burgers, noisy Darcy permeability inversion, three-dimensional Allen--Cahn reaction identification, and unsteady Navier--Stokes viscosity identification. The results show that the representation of the unknown largely determines the preferred method: grid-based fields favor the discrete adjoint, whereas neural representations are native to PINNs and relevant for closure and constitutive modeling. For time-dependent problems, adjoint inversion can be dominated by trajectory storage and differentiation, while PINNs provide satisfactory reconstructions at lower cost. A PINN-warm-started adjoint strategy then recovers adjoint-level accuracy at substantially reduced cost.

Zhen Zhang, Alessandro Alla, George Em Karniadakis

Conventional Physics-Informed Neural Networks Ill-Posed Inverse Problem Adjoint Matching Inverse Problem Neural Network Cold-Start+1

Ask PDF

Feb 13, 2026cs.LG

Learning functional components of PDEs from data using neural networks

Partial differential equation (PDE) models frequently contain unknown functional terms that cannot be measured directly, limiting their predictive utility. While data-driven methods for estimating scalar PDE parameters are well established, the recovery of unknown functions remains comparatively underexplored. Here, we show that standard parameter estimation workflows can be extended to infer functional components of PDEs directly from data. Our approach embeds neural networks within the PDE framework, allowing unknown functions to be learned during training with high accuracy. Using nonlocal aggregation-diffusion equations as a case study, we infer interaction kernels and external potentials from steady-state observations. We systematically examine how reconstruction accuracy depends on factors such as the number and diversity of available solutions, sampling density, and measurement noise. The resulting framework retains the advantages of conventional PDE calibration approaches while extending them to functional inference: once trained, the PDE model can be used in the standard way to analyse system behaviour and generate predictions.

Torkel E. Loman, Yurij Salmaniw, Antonio Leon Villares +2

Partial Differential Equations Neural-Network Approximation Neural Network Inference Engine

Ask PDF

May 16, 2026cs.AI

Harnessing AI for Inverse Partial Differential Equation Problems: Past, Present, and Prospects

Solving inverse partial differential equation (PDE) problems is a fundamental topic in scientific research due to its broad significance across a wide range of real-world applications. Inverse PDE problems arise across medical imaging, geophysics, materials science, and aerodynamics, where the goal is to infer hidden causes, design structures, or control physical states. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of recent advances in solving inverse PDE problems using artificial intelligence (AI). We first introduce the basic formulation, key challenges, and traditional numerical foundations of inverse PDE problems, and then organize it into three major categories: inverse problems, inverse design, and control problems. For each category, we further present a methodological paradigms, and review representative state-of-the-art approaches from recent years. We then summarize representative applications across scientific and industrial domains, including mechanical systems, aerodynamic problems, thermal systems, full-waveform inversion, system identification, and medical imaging. Finally, we discuss open challenges and future prospects, such as physics-informed architectures, limited real-world data, uncertainty quantification, and inverse foundation models. This survey aims to provide the first unified and systematic perspective on AI for inverse PDE problems, demonstrating how modern learning-based methods are reshaping inverse problems, inverse design, and control problems in PDE-governed systems.

Zhentao Tan, Yuze Hao, Boyi Zou +3

Ill-Posed Inverse Problem Inverse Design Artificial Intelligence Systems

Ask PDF