Context-CoT: Enhancing Context Learning via High-Quality Reasoning Synthesis

Recent benchmarks reveal that despite strong reasoning capabilities, large language models (LLMs) still struggle to faithfully apply complex contextual knowledge. These failures are often not wholesale reasoning collapses: in context-rich tasks, models may follow the central reasoning path while missing peripheral, persistent, or format-sensitive requirements.

Context learning is an emerging inference-time task where LLMs must learn and apply novel, task-specific knowledge from intricate contexts absent from pre-training; even frontier models score under 24% task success. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive empirical study to understand why this setting remains difficult. A natural hypothesis is that failures stem from content access; yet across twelve retrieval, reflection, and verification baselines on CL-Bench, an extensive context learning benchmark, we find limited gains over direct full-context prompting. Further failure analysis reveals a key finding: unlike typical long-context tasks such as long document understanding, context learning requires not only recovering local content but also acquiring local specifications that are often unspecified in the query but distributed across the context: domain-specific formats, local rules, and completeness conditions. Across all 31,592 rubric items, we find that 55.4% clearly evaluate specification acquisition, while only 22.6% evaluate content acquisition. Moreover, despite 76.7% of specifications being unspecified in the user query, 95.5% are traceable to the context, indicating these are learnable obligations rather than hidden requirements. To validate this diagnosis, we design a deliberately simple intervention PSCI (private specification-contract induction) which extracts local specifications and enforces them through adversarial checking and repair; PSCI achieves state-of-the-art 28.14% with GPT-5.1 (+5.59 pp absolute and +24.8% relative) on CL-Bench, replicated on Qwen3.5-27B (+5.28 pp) and Gemini 3 Pro (+6.17 pp). Seventeen ablations further isolate the role of task-specific specifications. Overall, our results suggest context learning hinges on not only content acquisition but also specification acquisition.

Large language models (LLMs) increasingly handle in-context learning (ICL) tasks where a long, novel context defines the rules, knowledge, and output schema for a series of questions. On benchmarks that grade against every detail of the context, even strong open-weights models pass only 12-16% of tasks: a single overlooked rule fails the whole response. We argue this brittleness is structural: the dominant "read-and-reason" paradigm asks the model to extract, plan, generate, and self-verify in one forward pass. We therefore ask whether explicit context compilation can fix it, how it compares to existing long-context strategies (gist retrieval, multi-agent self-play), and where the resulting harness benefit holds across task structure and model scale. We propose the Context Compilation Architecture (CCA), whose central novelty is a typed intermediate representation (IR) with fixed slots (rules.{must_do, must_not, conditional}, output_spec, available_tools, data_profile) into which any prose context is compiled once; executable verifiers and a violation-gated correction loop follow as downstream consequences. On CL-bench (1,899 tasks across 4 open base models), CCA outperforms vanilla prompting and two long-context baselines (ReadAgent-P, Ctx2Skill) on every base model, lifting Kimi K2.5 from 15.4% to 21.4% with gains concentrated on rule-dense sub-categories. Code and cached completions are available at https://github.com/TonyQJH/cca-emnlp2026.