Anatomy-Anchored Self-Supervision: Distilling Vision Foundation Models for Invariant Ultrasound Representation

Ultrasound (US) imaging poses unique challenges for representation learning due to its inherently noisy acquisition process. The low signal-to-noise ratio and stochastic speckle patterns hinder standard self-supervised learning methods relying on a pixel-level reconstruction objective. Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) address this drawback by predicting masked latent representations rather than raw pixels. However, standard approaches depend on hyperparameter-brittle and computationally expensive online teachers updated via exponential moving average. We propose US-JEPA, a self-supervised framework that adopts the Static-teacher Asymmetric Latent Training (SALT) objective. By using a frozen, domain-specific teacher to provide stable latent targets, US-JEPA decouples student-teacher optimization and pushes the student to expand upon the semantic priors of the teacher. In addition, we provide the first rigorous comparison of all publicly available state-of-the-art ultrasound foundation models on UltraBench, a public dataset benchmark spanning multiple organs and pathological conditions. Under linear probing for diverse classification tasks, US-JEPA achieves performance competitive with or superior to domain-specific and universal vision foundation model baselines. Our results demonstrate that masked latent prediction provides a stable and efficient path toward robust ultrasound representations.

Ultrasound foundation models have achieved strong performance on structured prediction tasks but remain exclusively vision-based, limiting zero-shot and few-shot transfer to novel tasks where task-specific annotation is scarce. We address this gap with EchoCare-CLIP, a CLIP-style dual-encoder contrastive framework that aligns ultrasound images with clinical text in a shared embedding space. We curate a multi-organ corpus of over 16K image-text pairs spanning breast, liver, lung, and thyroid, with over 78% of captions derived from expert-annotated reports, and complement the remainder with a three-tier template-based and LLM-based caption generation pipeline. We evaluate model configurations spanning two text encoder families (CLIP, BioClinicalBERT) and two caption strategies (template-based, LLM-generated) against OpenAI CLIP and BiomedCLIP baselines. Our trained models consistently improve cross-modal alignment over baselines, with the best configuration achieving a paired alignment score of 0.682. However, stronger alignment does not guarantee better downstream performance: CLIP-based variants with partial fine-tuning achieve the strongest zero-shot classification on external held-out datasets (0.709 on BUSI; 0.626 on AULI), while full end-to-end fine-tuning degrades transfer due to overfitting. On linear probing and few-shot adaptation, model rankings are dataset-dependent, reflecting a trade-off between domain adaptation and representational generalizability. We further show that template-based captions match or outperform LLM-generated captions, suggesting lexical diversity is not a proxy for caption quality. Taken together, our results demonstrate that ultrasound vision-language alignment is achievable from public data alone, but robust clinical transfer requires careful balancing of domain adaptation, encoder capacity, and caption supervision quality.

Self-supervised learning (SSL) can reduce the need for labelled medical images, but the choice of pretext objective remains unclear for lung ultrasound (LUS). Contrastive learning, masked reconstruction, and joint-embedding predictive architectures (JEPA) differ in the space in which their targets are defined, yet existing ultrasound studies compare them under different corpora, backbones, and evaluation protocols. We compare these three objective families using the same encoder backbone, pretraining corpus, optimisation schedule, and frozen-evaluation protocol. Encoders are pretrained on COVID-BLUeS LUS videos and evaluated with linear, $k$NN, and attentive probes at 5%, 10%, 50%, and 100% label budgets. Evaluation is performed on POCUS using patient-level five-fold cross-validation and on the independently acquired Mendeley-Uganda dataset, which is excluded from both pretraining and probe fitting. At the full label budget under linear probing, VideoMAE and V-JEPA achieve $66.5 \pm 13.1$ and $65.4 \pm 11.7$ balanced accuracy on POCUS, while MoCo achieves $42.1 \pm 1.2$. On Mendeley-Uganda, the ranking reverses: MoCo performs best at $62.7 \pm 1.0$, followed by VideoMAE at $53.8 \pm 2.8$, while V-JEPA falls near chance at $35.1 \pm 4.9$. These results show that POCUS probe accuracy alone does not identify the objective that transfers best across datasets. We also outline planned representation-level analyses to examine this reversal. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/moeinheidari7829/LUSVideoSSL.