Hybrid post-training usually combines supervised fine-tuning and reinforcement learning, but fixed mixing schedules cannot adapt when the relative noise of the two signals changes over time. We propose GAC, a noise-aware controller that derives an adaptive mixing weight from online estimates of gradient variance and disagreement between the two training signals. The method adds smoothing, prior guidance, and bounded updates while reusing existing training tensors. Experiments on math, code, science, and logic benchmarks show that GAC consistently improves hybrid post-training over strong fixed and rule-based baselines, with larger gains at larger model scales and less than 1% training overhead.
Post-training has become essential for adapting large language models (LLMs) to complex downstream behaviors, including instruction following, preference alignment, and multi-step reasoning. Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently emerged as a particularly effective post-training paradigm for improving reasoning capabilities, with critic-free algorithms such as GRPO and GSPO enabling scalable optimization. However, RLVR post-training with full fine-tuning (FFT) requires substantial GPU memory and incurs high training costs. Although parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods, such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), effectively reduce computational costs, they often suffer from a noticeable performance gap compared to full fine-tuning in post-training for complex reasoning tasks. In this paper, we propose Hybrid-LoRA, an efficient hybrid post-training framework that selectively applies full fine-tuning to a small subset of modules less suited to low-rank adaptation, while adapting the remaining components with LoRA. We introduce a novel Hybrid-LoRA Score to rank candidate modules according to their sensitivity to low-rank adaptation under a fixed parameter budget. Experiments show that Hybrid-LoRA closely matches full fine-tuning performance under a 10% full fine-tuning module budget, with the remaining candidate modules adapted by LoRA, consistently outperforming four state-of-the-art PEFT post-training baselines, achieving improvements of up to 5.65% and on average 4.36% over the best baseline.
Reinforcement learning post-training unlocks complex reasoning in LLMs. Yet benchmark scores reveal only whether a model improved, not what changed inside it, nor how it splits finite capability across tasks. A representative interpretability line attributes the success of RL fine-tuning to stronger and more diverse circuit activation. We challenge this activation-centered account by separating activation from control: an activated circuit need not control the post-training reward gain. Adapting Metabolic Control Analysis, we define the Post-training Control Coefficient to measure component control over reward gain and arrange these coefficients by task family into a control matrix, paired with an activation-magnitude matrix. We call cross-task control concentration the Shared Control Bottleneck and the difference between activation and control concentration the Activation-Control Gap. This reveals that highly shared activations can coexist with task-specific control, while a small gap indicates that control has collapsed onto a shared direction and lost task specificity. To reduce this collapse, we regularize the post-training loss with the Shared Control Bottleneck and propose Control-Diverse Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (CD-RFT). The exact regularizer gradient requires second-order automatic differentiation incompatible with flash attention, so we derive a first-order proxy with worst-case overhead below eight percent. On Qwen2.5-7B, CD-RFT achieves the largest control decoupling and improves multi-task capability over matched GRPO across mathematics, code, and logic. The no-KL variant leads on pass@1, and the KL-penalized variant leads on large-k pass@k coverage that KL otherwise degrades. Together, these results show that the Shared Control Bottleneck is both a mechanistic diagnostic and a training regularizer, and that control decoupling and capability gains transfer to Llama-3.2-3B.
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) or Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) are two key steps in the post-training of modern Language Models (LMs). A common problem is reward hacking, where the policy may exploit inaccuracies of the reward and learn an unintended behavior. Most previous works address this by limiting the policy update with a Kullback-Leibler (KL) penalty towards a reference model. We propose a different framing: Train the LM in a way that biases policy updates towards regions in which the reward is more accurate. First, we derive a theoretical connection between the accuracy of a reward model and the flatness of an optimum at convergence. Gradient regularization (GR) can then be used to bias training to flatter regions and thereby maintain reward model accuracy. We confirm these results by showing that the gradient norm and reward accuracy are empirically correlated in RLHF. We then empirically show that Reference Resets of the KL penalty find flatter regions with a higher reward accuracy. We further improve on this by proposing to use explicit GR with an efficient finite-difference estimate. Empirically, GR performs better than a KL penalty across a diverse set of RL experiments with LMs. GR achieves a higher GPT-judged win-rate in RLHF, avoids overly focusing on the format in rule-based math rewards, and prevents hacking the judge in LLM-as-a-Judge math tasks.
Johannes Ackermann, Michael Noukhovitch, Takashi Ishida +1