cs.LGMay 26, 2026

SparseOpt: Addressing Normalization-induced Gradient Skew in Sparse Training

Authors: Mohammed AdnanRohan JainTom JacobsEkansh SharmaRahul G. KrishnanRebekka BurkholzYani Ioannou

Organizations: University of Calgary · 2Vector Institute · 3CISPA Helmholtz · Center for Information Security · University of Toronto

Abstract

Dynamic Sparse Training (DST) methods train neural networks by maintaining sparsity while dynamically adapting the network topology. Despite the promise of reduced computation, DST methods converge significantly slower than dense training, often requiring comparable training time to achieve similar accuracy. We demonstrate both analytically and empirically that Batch Normalization (BN) adversely affects sparse training, and propose SparseOpt, a sparsity-aware optimizer, to address this. Experiments on ResNet models across CIFAR-100 and ImageNet demonstrate consistently faster convergence and improved generalization with our proposed method. Our work highlights the limitations of current normalization layers in sparse training and provides the first systematic study of the interaction between Batch Normalization, sparse layers, and DST, taking a significant step toward making DST practically competitive with dense training.

Explore similar work

May 30, 2026cs.LG

Memory-Efficient LLM Training with Dynamic Sparsity: From Stability to Practical Scaling

Dynamic Sparse Training (DST) offers a promising paradigm for improving the training and inference efficiency of deep neural networks; however, we find that in large language model training, DST can suffer from optimization instability, manifested as loss spikes after topology updates. In this work, we show that the naive use of standard Adam-based optimizers leads to a cold-start issue for newly regrown parameters, resulting in excessively large updates and disrupted training dynamics. To address this issue, we propose Sparse Memory-Efficient Training (SMET), which stabilizes DST with optimizer warm-up and improves training progress through density-aware learning-rate scaling. SMET further reduces memory consumption by storing gradients and optimizer states only for active parameters. We provide a theoretical analysis of the update behaviors under SMET, showing improved optimization stability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SMET enables stable, scalable, and memory-efficient sparse pre-training of LLMs, paving the way for sparse training as a practical alternative to dense training. Our code is publicly available at: https://github.com/QiaoXiao7282/SMET.
Qiao Xiao, Boqian Wu, Patrik Okanovic +6
May 20, 2026cs.LG

HORST: Composing Optimizer Geometries for Sparse Transformer Training

Sparsifying transformers remains a fundamental challenge, as standard optimizers fail to simultaneously encourage sparsity and maintain training stability. Effective adaptive optimizers exhibit an implicit LL_{\infty} bias favoring stability, yet, sparsity requires an L1L_1 bias. To integrate sparsity, we propose a composition of optimizer steps, which we cast as non-commutative operators to analyze and combine their optimization geometry in a principled way. This yields HORST (Hyperbolic Operator for Robust Sparse Training), a modular optimizer that inherits stability from adaptive methods while inducing L1L_1 sparsity bias through a hyperbolic mirror map. Our experiments demonstrate its utility for sparse training of transformers on both vision and language tasks. HORST consistently and significantly outperforms AdamW baselines across all sparsity levels, with large gains at higher sparsity.
Tom Jacobs, Rohan Jain, Rebekka Burkholz
May 8, 2026cs.LG

Adaptive Regularization for Sparsity Control in Bregman-Based Optimizers

Sparse training reduces the memory and computational costs of deep neural networks. However, sparse optimization methods, e.g., those adding an 1\ell_1 penalty, often control sparsity only indirectly through a regularization parameter λλ, whose mapping to the final sparsity rate is non-trivial. In our experiments, we found this parameter sensitivity to be particularly pronounced for Bregman-based optimizers. Specifically, the two variants LinBreg and AdaBreg reach the same sparsity at λλ values that differ by up to two orders of magnitude, requiring expensive trial-and-error sweeps to achieve a user-specified sparsity. To address this, we propose an adaptive regularization scheme that updates λλ based on the difference between the model's current sparsity and the target sparsity. We analyze the resulting algorithm and evaluate it on automatic speaker verification with ECAPA-TDNN and ResNet34 on VoxCeleb and CNCeleb. The proposed method reliably achieves sparsity targets ranging between 75% and 99%. It also converges faster than the oracle-tuned non-adaptive baseline during early training and matches or surpasses its final performance in equal error rate. We further show that the adaptive scheme inherits key properties from its non-adaptive counterpart, including improved out-of-distribution robustness over the dense baselines.
Ahmad Aloradi, Tim Roith, Emanuël A. P. Habets +1