cs.CRMay 27, 2026

Privately Estimating Monotone Statistics in Polynomial Time

Authors: Gavin BrownEphraim LinderMahbod MajidVikrant Singhal

Organizations: University of Wisconsin–Madison · Boston University · MIT Mathematics · University of Copenhagen

Abstract

We study efficient differentially private algorithms for estimating monotone statistics, i.e., statistics that are monotone under the addition of new observations. The starting point for our investigation is subsample-and-aggregate: a classical paradigm that partitions the dataset into blocks, estimates the statistic on each block, and then privately aggregates the estimates. While practical and generically applicable, this approach is quite data-hungry. We improve upon this framework for the class of monotone statistics -- compared to subsample-and-aggregate, our algorithms save a factor of tt in sample complexity and pay a factor of ete^t in running time, where t>0t>0 is a tunable parameter. We complement our results with a query-complexity lower bound, showing that our algorithms are essentially optimal for this task. As an application, we obtain improved results for private eigenvalue estimation, private loss estimation, and privately estimating a single parameter of a high-dimensional model, e.g., in linear regression.

Explore similar work

May 20, 2025cs.LG

A Private Approximation of the 2nd-Moment Matrix of Any Subsamplable Input

We study the problem of differentially private second moment estimation and present a new algorithm that achieve strong privacy-utility trade-offs even for worst-case inputs under subsamplability assumptions on the data. We call an input (m,α,β)(m,α,β)-subsamplable if a random subsample of size mm (or larger) preserves w.p 1β\geq 1-β the spectral structure of the original second moment matrix up to a multiplicative factor of 1±α1\pm α. Building upon subsamplability, we give a recursive algorithmic framework similar to Kamath et al 2019, that abides zero-Concentrated Differential Privacy (zCDP) while preserving w.h.p. the accuracy of the second moment estimation upto an arbitrary factor of (1±γ)(1\pmγ). We then show how to apply our algorithm to approximate the second moment matrix of a distribution D\mathcal{D}, even when a noticeable fraction of the input are outliers.
Bar Mahpud, Or Sheffet
Nov 17, 2025cs.LG

On the Gradient Complexity of Private Optimization with Private Oracles

We study the running time, in terms of first order oracle queries, of differentially private empirical/population risk minimization of Lipschitz convex losses. We first consider the setting where the loss is non-smooth and the optimizer interacts with a private proxy oracle, which sends only private messages about a minibatch of gradients. In this setting, we show that expected running time Ω(min{dα2,dlog(1/α)})Ω(\min\{\frac{\sqrt{d}}{α^2}, \frac{d}{\log(1/α)}\}) is necessary to achieve αα excess risk on problems of dimension dd when d1/α2d \geq 1/α^2. Upper bounds via DP-SGD show these results are tight when d>Ω~(1/α4)d>\tildeΩ(1/α^4). We further show our lower bound can be strengthened to Ω(min{dmˉα2,dlog(1/α)})Ω(\min\{\frac{d}{\bar{m}α^2}, \frac{d}{\log(1/α)} \}) for algorithms which use minibatches of size at most mˉ<d\bar{m} < \sqrt{d}. We next consider smooth losses, where we relax the private oracle assumption and give lower bounds under only the condition that the optimizer is private. Here, we lower bound the expected number of first order oracle calls by Ω~(dα+min{1α2,n})\tildeΩ\big(\frac{\sqrt{d}}α + \min\{\frac{1}{α^2}, n\}\big), where nn is the size of the dataset. Modifications to existing algorithms show this bound is nearly tight. Compared to non-private lower bounds, our results show that differentially private optimizers pay a dimension dependent runtime penalty. Finally, as a natural extension of our proof technique, we show lower bounds in the non-smooth setting for optimizers interacting with information limited oracles. Specifically, if the proxy oracle transmits at most ΓΓ-bits of information about the gradients in the minibatch, then Ω(min{dα2Γ,dlog(1/α)})Ω\big(\min\{\frac{d}{α^2Γ}, \frac{d}{\log(1/α)}\}\big) oracle calls are needed. This result shows fundamental limitations of gradient quantization techniques in optimization.
Michael Menart, Aleksandar Nikolov
Jun 20, 2026cs.LG

On the Curse of Dimensionality in Private Sparse Covariance Estimation and PCA

We study high-dimensional differentially private (DP) covariance estimation in the operator norm, and principal component analysis (PCA), under kk-row-column sparsity (kk-RCS) of the covariance matrix. In the non-private setting, it is known that poly(k,logd)\mathsf{poly}(k, \log d) samples suffice to solve both of these problems. However, the only comparable result known under DP (Wang et al. 2021) requires Ω(d)Ω(d) samples under standard parameterizations of the problem. We investigate when this curse of dimensionality is inherent for sparse covariance estimation tasks under DP. On the upper bound front, we show that a poly(k,logd)\mathsf{poly}(k, \log d) sample complexity for PCA is possible under DP, if we also posit sparsity of the leading eigenvector. We complement this result with poly(d)\mathsf{poly}(d) lower bounds under DP for both sparse covariance estimation and PCA, establishing an exponential gap between the private and non-private variants of these problems when k=polylog(d)k = \mathsf{polylog}(d). To our knowledge, no such separation has previously been demonstrated for any sparse estimation problems in private high-dimensional statistics. Our techniques are flexible enough that they imply stronger lower bounds even for the well-studied problem of standard DP PCA, without sparsity assumptions.
Syamantak Kumar, Shourya Pandey, Purnamrita Sarkar +1