HPO: Hysteretic Policy Optimization for Stable and Efficient Training under Sparse-Reward Regime

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has been a key driver of recent progress in reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) for large language models, but it is typically trained in a low-staleness, near-on-policy regime that incurs substantial system overhead. We ask a simple question: How off-policy can GRPO be? We show that GRPO-style algorithms can tolerate substantially larger rollout staleness than previously assumed, and propose Mu-GRPO, an RL training framework that organizes training into a small number (e.g., four) of large sequential generation-optimization stages. This design induces high rollout staleness while greatly reducing rollout-optimization switching overhead. To stabilize learning under stale data, Mu-GRPO combines relaxed clipping, which preserves useful stale-rollout gradients, with negative-advantage veto, which removes destabilizing post-trigger suffix updates in negative-advantage responses. Across five language models and multiple math reasoning benchmarks, Mu-GRPO matches or exceeds the performance of standard GRPO while achieving around 2x speedup in wall-clock training time, establishing a substantially improved performance-efficiency trade-off for LLM reinforcement learning.

Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is the dominant reinforcement learning algorithm for training reasoning capabilities in large language models, notably adopted by DeepSeek-R1. The recent improvement Dr. GRPO (COLM 2025) identifies the response-level length bias caused by per-trajectory length normalization in GRPO and proposes removing this normalization, claiming the resulting optimizer is "unbiased." We show that this claim is incomplete. Specifically, we establish an impossibility theorem: under the standard outcome reward + GRPO setting, no length-based weighting scheme can simultaneously achieve the following two properties. (P1) Gradient unbiasedness: the gradient estimator is an unbiased estimate of the true policy gradient. (P2) Length invariance: each trajectory's effective contribution to the gradient is independent of its token length. GRPO approximately satisfies P2 but violates P1; Dr. GRPO satisfies P1 but violates P2. We characterize the complete tradeoff spectrum via the parametric family f_alpha(L) = L^{alpha - 1}, where alpha = 0 recovers GRPO, alpha = 1 recovers Dr. GRPO, and provide quantitative analysis showing that Dr. GRPO's length bias can cause longer trajectories to dominate gradient updates by a factor proportional to the length ratio. Our results reveal that neither algorithm is universally "done right"; they occupy opposite ends of a fundamental and unavoidable tradeoff.

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards improves reasoning in large language models, yet on-policy learning often suffers from cold-start challenges in sparse-reward settings. Recent mixed-policy approaches address this by combining off-policy teacher data with on-policy training. However, simply combining these introduce a persistent off-policy gradient mass that risks training collapse and instability. To address this challenge, we propose Hindsight-Anchored Policy Optimization (HAPO), a framework that allows teacher intervention to act as a temporary support. HAPO employs Beta-Binomial confidence gating, an adaptive gating mechanism that decides when to open the gate for teacher intervention. The intervention operates with Synthetic Success Injection, which replaces the group's lowest-reward rollout with a verified teacher trajectory. We also introduce adaptive threshold annealing, which gradually retracts the support and restores on-policy training within a finite horizon to mitigate persistent off-policy drift. We demonstrate that HAPO can be layered on top of existing mixed-policy methods in a generalizable manner. Across six math reasoning benchmarks and two model scales, HAPO improves the average accuracy of three major mixed-policy methods while maintaining training stability.