Authors: Fabrizio Fagiolo, Marco Baioletti, Valentino Santucci
Organizations: University for Foreigners of Perugia, Perugia 06123, Italy · University of Perugia, Perugia 06123, Italy
Abstract
The Linear Ordering Problem (LOP) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with important applications in areas such as economics, social choice, and machine learning. Its most prominent use is the triangulation of economic input-output tables, which helps identify critical industries in an economy. Most existing algorithms have been evaluated on benchmarks derived from outdated macroeconomic data, which no longer reflect the structure of contemporary economies. Furthermore, LOP instances often exhibit many distinct global optima that can differ substantially from one another, creating challenges for applications that rely on a single solution. To address these limitations, we introduce a novel benchmark suite derived from up-to-date real-world economic data and an algorithmic scheme that leverages state-of-the-art LOP metaheuristics to generate diverse sets of high-quality solutions, together with metrics for assessing both quality and diversity. Experiments were conducted to report results on the proposed benchmark suite under both the traditional single-solution setting and the newly introduced multi-solution scenario
Online linear programming (OLP) has gained significant attention from both researchers and practitioners due to its extensive applications such as online auctions, network revenue management, order fulfillment and advertising. Existing OLP algorithms fall into two categories: LP-based algorithms and LP-free algorithms. The former typically guarantees better performance but requires solving a large number of LPs, which could be computationally expensive. In contrast, LP-free algorithms only require first-order computations but induce a worse performance. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two extremes by proposing a well-performing algorithm that solves LPs at a few selected time points and conducts first-order computations at other time points. Specifically, for the case where the inputs are drawn from an unknown finite-support distribution, the proposed algorithm achieves a constant regret (even for the hard "degenerate" case) while solving LPs only O(loglogT) times over the time horizon T. Moreover, when we are allowed to solve LPs only M times, we design the corresponding schedule such that the proposed algorithm can guarantee a nearly O(T(1/2)M−1) regret. Our work highlights the value of resolving both at the beginning and the end of the selling horizon, and provides a novel framework to prove the performance guarantee of the proposed policy under different infrequent resolving schedules. Numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate remarkable reasoning, complex optimization tasks remain challenging, requiring domain knowledge and robust implementation. However, existing benchmarks focus narrowly on Mathematical Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, hindering comprehensive evaluation. To address this, we introduce OptiVerse, a comprehensive benchmark of 1,000 curated problems spanning neglected domains, including Stochastic Optimization, Dynamic Optimization, Game Optimization, and Optimal Control, across three difficulty levels: Easy, Medium, and Hard. The experiments with 22 LLMs of different sizes reveal sharp performance degradation on hard problems, where even advanced models like GPT-5.2 and Gemini-3 struggle to exceed 27% accuracy. Through error analysis, we identify that modeling & logic errors remain the primary bottleneck. Consequently, we propose a Dual-View Auditor Agent that improves the accuracy of the LLM modeling process without introducing significant time overhead. OptiVerse will serve as a foundational platform for advancing LLMs in solving complex optimization challenges.
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for optimization modeling and solver-code generation, yet practical operations research and optimization problems often require a harder capability: designing scalable algorithms that exploit problem structure and outperform direct formulation-and-solve baselines. Existing benchmarks are limited to small or simplified examples far below real-world scale and complexity. We introduce FrontierOR, among the first benchmarks to systematically evaluate LLM-based efficient algorithm design for realistic large-scale optimization problems. FrontierOR includes 180 tasks derived from methodologically diverse papers published in top-tier operations research venues, each with standardized instances and a hidden, expert-verified evaluation suite. We evaluate seven LLMs spanning frontier, cost-effective, and open-source models both in one-shot and test-time evolution settings. The results reveal that frontier models still struggle to move from executable formulations to efficient optimization algorithms: the strongest one-shot model outperforms Gurobi in only 31% of cases in both solution quality and computational efficiency, and even strong coding agents with test-time evolution achieve only 50% on selected hard tasks. FrontierOR establishes a practical evaluation platform for LLM-based optimization algorithm design, which enables future LLMs and agents to be systematically tested on whether they can move beyond correct formulation toward a feasible, high-quality, and efficient algorithm. Code and data are publicly released at https://github.com/Minw913/FrontierOR.