Vision-Language Models Suppress Female Representations Under Ambiguous Input

Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to make decisions from visual inputs. We introduce FAIRLENS, a benchmark and evaluation framework for measuring both the fairness and the validity of VLM responses in three high-stakes domains: hiring, legal, and healthcare. FAIRLENS pairs real face images spanning gender, race, and age groups with closed- and open-ended questions, giving more than 100K image-question pairs per model, and evaluates responses from four complementary views: demographic parity over adverse outcome rates, soundness, demographic association over unsupported roles and statuses, and bias in free-text generation. Soundness is the central validity criterion: a response is sound when it follows the evidence stated in the question and abstains when the image cannot support an answer. Evaluating eight VLMs, we find that the primary failure is unwarranted inference rather than unequal treatment. Models routinely infer qualifications, threat, illness, or professional role from a face instead of abstaining, and the weakest model does so on 99% of the questions its input cannot answer. These failures are most severe in legal and healthcare, where recognizing insufficient evidence matters most, and disparity metrics alone would miss them: parity gaps are small in absolute terms, yet when baseline adverse rates are low the same gap means one demographic group receives adverse labels several times as often as another, and a small gap can equally reflect a model that treats every group unsafely. Bias in free-text responses is only loosely coupled to multiple-choice accuracy, so correct structured answers do not imply safe generation. FAIRLENS shows that fair high-stakes VLM behavior requires similar treatment across groups and refusal to infer high-stakes attributes from appearance, and its question suite transfers to any face corpus with demographic annotations.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly power high-stakes applications, from medical imaging to autonomous systems, yet they routinely hallucinate, confidently describing content not present in the input. We investigate the root causes of these failure modes with a mechanistic analysis focusing on the decoder-based VLMs. We trace these failure modes to a geometric over-alignment: to bridge the modality gap required by attention mechanisms, decoder-based VLMs over-align visual embeddings with the text manifold, injecting a statistical linguistic bias that systematically overshadows fine-grained visual evidence. While prior work either aggressively closes this gap or suppresses hallucinations through expensive black-box decoding strategies, none addresses the underlying geometric cause. We provide the first quantitative characterization of this over-alignment, demonstrating that linguistic bias concentrates in the top principal components of a universal, dataset-agnostic text subspace. Building on this insight, we propose two complementary remedies: a training-free inference strategy and a bias-aware fine-tuning paradigm, both of which explicitly project out this subspace from visual representations. Our methods significantly reduce hallucinations across POPE, CHAIR, and AMBER benchmarks, and improve CLAIR scores on long-form captioning tasks, with the training-free variant adding no computational overhead over the base model.

Gender bias in large vision-language models (LVLMs) undermines their fairness and reliability, compromising output trustworthiness. Current mitigation methods rely on training-phase adjustments or post-hoc calibration, but face limitations in dynamic visual bias mitigation. These include inability to capture real-time visual-textual incongruence, dependence on predefined gender bias taxonomies, and degraded cross-modal alignment with emergent bias patterns. To address these challenges, we propose ViD, a causally-inspired framework that analyzes attention mechanisms across five distinct patterns, revealing confounding effects from strong language priors. ViD demonstrates that visual-to-language cross-attention effectively suppresses bias while preserving general reasoning capabilities and text generation quality. ViD incorporates dual mechanisms: backdoor adjustment counters strong language priors, while refined token selection in decoding layers optimizes processing. This enhances model robustness and inference efficiency. Our integrated approach significantly mitigates gender bias across multidimensional social attributes in LVLMs, improving visual grounding and output fairness. Cross-benchmark validation shows ViD reduces gender bias by 14.7% on single-attribute evaluations (FACET) and achieves significant improvements on image captioning tasks (MS COCO), with gender bias score improving from 0.6708 to 0.9978 for LLaVA. Crucially, these improvements require no additional training overhead, making ViD a scalable and practical solution for bias mitigation in LVLMs.