Dual-Route Top-K Retrieval with 1v1 VLM Reranking for the CoVR-R

Composed Video Retrieval (CoVR) seeks the target video that results from applying a free-form textual modification to a reference video. We address the \emph{Reason-Aware} CoVR (CoVR-R) challenge at the CVPR~2026 VidLLMs workshop, where retrieval is strictly zero-shot. We present \textbf{R3-CoVR} (\emph{Reason, Retrieve, Re-rank}), a training-free pipeline built entirely from frozen foundation models. A multimodal large language model (Qwen3-VL-8B) reasons about the \emph{after-effects} an edit implies -- state transitions, action phases, scene, camera and tempo -- and verbalises a concise post-edit description; a contrastive video--text encoder (SigLIP-2) embeds this description and the gallery for first-stage retrieval; finally a constraint-aware re-ranking stage uses the same multimodal model as a judge that scores each shortlisted candidate against the intended edited result. On the challenge test set, R3-CoVR attains \textbf{91.9% R@1} and \textbf{98.2% R@10}. Two findings drive these results: (i)~matching the description length to the contrastive encoder's text window lifts \Rk{1} from $67.5$ to $72.7$; and (ii)~the constraint-aware re-ranker, which reorders only the shortlist, lifts \Rk{1} from $72.7$ to $91.9$ -- the single largest gain. We analyse the re-ranker's behaviour, the retrieve/re-rank blend, and the shortlist depth, and we release a clean three-layer implementation.

The CoVR-R challenge evaluates composed video retrieval, where a system must retrieve a target video from a large gallery given a reference video and a textual edit instruction. This setting is not a standard video-text retrieval problem: the query is defined by both the visual evidence in the source video and the transformation implied by the edit. A strong embedding model can provide scalable candidate recall, but it may under-express target-side consequences such as state changes, action replacement, object preservation, or temporal consistency. A pairwise multimodal reranker can verify such details more directly, but exhaustive reranking over the full gallery is computationally infeasible. We present $\mathbb{R}^3$, a zero-shot composed video retrieval pipeline built around Reasoning-guided Recalling and Reranking. The core idea is to turn the source-edit query into a reasoning-grounded retrieval program rather than treating the edit text as a short caption. First, the model generates a reasoning trace that describes the expected target video after applying the edit. Then the trace is encoded together with the source video as a reasoning-augmented query, and its retrieval score is fused with the base composed query through an agreement-gated residual rule. At last, a re-ranker verifies the recalled candidates with direct source-candidate comparison. Experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of our method in addressing this challenge. Codes are available on https://github.com/Lee-zixu/R-3.

CoVR-R studies reason-aware composed video retrieval: given a reference video and an edit instruction, the system must retrieve the target video that satisfies the edit. The main difficulty is that the target is not described directly; it must be inferred from fine-grained changes in object identity, action order, final state, hand interaction, and scene transition. We build a zero-shot reason-then-retrieve pipeline around Qwen3.5-27B. For each gallery video, the model generates a retrieval-oriented structured description and a dense embedding by pooling generated-token hidden states with token-dependent weights. For each query, the model first performs edit reasoning over the reference video and instruction, then generates a target-video description whose hidden states serve as the query embedding. We complement dense retrieval with a TF-IDF branch over the generated texts and fuse the two rankings with split-specific weights. On validation, the current best submission reaches 80.81 at R@1, 94.86 at R@5, 97.11 at R@10, and 98.59 at R@50. On the blind test split, it reaches 89.73 at R@1, 95.79 at R@5, 96.63 at R@10, and 97.98 at R@50.