stat.MLMay 31, 2026

Distribution-free changepoint localization after sequential change detection

Authors: Aytijhya SahaAaditya Ramdas

Organizations: Massachusetts Institute of Technology · Carnegie Mellon University

Abstract

This paper introduces a distribution-free framework for constructing post-detection confidence sets for changepoints after stopping a sequential change detection procedure. It is well known that conformal test martingales can be used to sequentially detect changes in distribution, but by themselves provide no inference for the time at which a proclaimed change occurred. Past work on post-detection inference requires pre- and post-change classes of distributions to be known, but this paper accomplishes localization of the changepoint without any distributional assumptions. We establish finite-sample coverage guarantees (conditional on correct detection). We provide non-asymptotic bounds on the conditional expected size of the confidence sets. Under suitable asymptotic regimes, we prove that the conditional expected size of the confidence set remains uniformly bounded and demonstrate strong empirical performance on simulated and real data. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first general distribution-free framework for sequential changepoint localization with valid post-detection coverage.

Explore similar work

Sep 8, 2026stat.ML

Distribution-free inference on the number of changepoints

Suppose we are given an ordered sequence of independent data whose distribution changes KK times at unknown locations, for some unknown K0K \geq 0. In this paper, we study the problem of performing distribution-free inference on KK. First, we show an impossibility result: any distribution-free upper confidence bound on KK must be trivial and uninformative. Then, using conformal pp-values, and under only the assumption that the data segments induced by the changepoints are exchangeable (within themselves) and mutually independent, we construct a finite-sample valid lower confidence bound on KK, which we call the Conformal LOwer bound on Changepoint Count (CLOCC). We show that CLOCC is the only feasible way to provide a lower bound on KK under the stated assumptions, a property we refer to as its universality. We provide practical guidelines for choosing score functions that yield efficient and tight lower bounds. We evaluate CLOCC in several synthetic and real-data experiments, where it provides informative lower bounds on KK, demonstrating its practical applicability.
Rohan Hore, Aaditya Ramdas
Aug 9, 2026stat.ML

ARC: Augmented-Rank Conformalization for Changepoint Localization --- Finite-Sample Validity and Distribution-Robust Efficiency

Conformal changepoint localization turns any score into a confidence set for the changepoint with finite-sample coverage. Coverage is universal; efficiency is not. The oracle score is a likelihood ratio, so practical scores estimate density ratios, and set length deteriorates under heavy tails, skewness, and distribution shift, where no length guarantee applies. We propose ARC (Augmented-Rank Conformalization), a family of scores depending on the data only through within-segment ranks: rank-CUSUM location and scale channels, their fixed combinations, and a lightweight neural score frozen after synthetic training. Every ARC score inherits finite-sample coverage for every frozen weight configuration, including random initialization and mistraining. The main result is an efficiency transfer theorem: the entire ARC confidence set is almost surely invariant under strictly increasing marginal transforms, so the set length distribution depends on the data pair only through its rank structure, and lengths certified once hold verbatim across its monotone orbit, whereas a plug-in score's length changes with every re-expression. Across different rank structures lengths do change, and are reported as such. Classical rank-test theory positions ARC as targeting the optimal invariant score at bounded cost. Simulations confirm nominal coverage for all scores, including sabotaged networks, identical sets under monotone transforms where plug-in scores inflate, and smooth degradation where plug-in sets become vacuous; on the well-log benchmark ARC localizes annotated shifts to three to five candidates and flags misfit by an empty set. Two boundaries are stated rather than hidden: serial dependence destroys exactness, and trend-type alternatives lie outside the piecewise-exchangeable model.
Chenchen Peng, Mixia Wu, Qijing Yan +2
May 1, 2026stat.ME

Pi-Change: A Prior-Informed Multiple Change Point Detection Algorithm

Statistical change point (CP) detection methods typically rely on likelihood-based inference and ignore contextual information about plausible CP locations beyond the observed sequence. Although informative priors provide a natural way to incorporate such information, general and computationally efficient methods for doing so are lacking, especially for multiple CP detection. To address this gap, we propose a prior-informed CP detection algorithm (Pi-Change) that incorporates prior information on CP locations through a time-varying penalty term. We prove that the proposed penalty can be embedded in the Pruned Exact Linear Time framework while preserving the dynamic programming recursion and pruning rule required for efficient multiple CP detection. Across simulation studies and three time-series applications, Pi-Change discourages spurious CPs unsupported by prior information, remains robust to prior misspecification, and improves detection accuracy. More broadly, Pi-Change extends multiple CP detection beyond purely data-driven fitting by incorporating partial prior knowledge in a computationally efficient and interpretable way. It is particularly useful when CPs arise from heterogeneous mechanisms or are associated with known external events, helping quantify the delay between an event and the resulting structural change.
Jonathon Jacobs, Shanshan Chen