Repair Before Veto: Repair-Augmented Constraint Learning for Contextual Decisions

Hard-constraint decision systems usually veto infeasible candidates. This is too rigid when the system can act: if a known affordable repair would make an infeasible candidate feasible and valuable, rejection is a false veto rather than a ranking error. We introduce Q-RACL (Quantum Repair-Augmented Constraint Learning), a repair-before-veto framework that first defines RACL decision semantics and then identifies the single inference link where quantum feature access can be load-bearing. RACL accepts a candidate when a sequential repair plan restores feasibility and preference; otherwise it returns structured rejection credit. The hard link is repair-feasibility inference: which repair class restores feasibility from an observed candidate and context. We construct a discrete-logarithm-hidden RACL family where the repair class is a shifted interval rule in the latent exponent a = log_g(x), while the learner observes only x = g^a mod p. Under standard DLP-based learning separation, this coordinate is inaccessible to efficient raw-input classical policies but accessible to a quantum agent through Shor/Fourier structure. Across six primes and ten seeds, bounded raw-input classical policies and a wrong raw-Fourier encoding remain near chance, whereas the Q-DLP policy keeps false-veto rate below 1.1%, wins all paired seeds, and yields QNI_cond = 0.9777 to 0.9972. A classical DLog oracle matches it, isolating feature access rather than classifier capacity. Thus quantum AI is not added as a generic model upgrade; for this DLP-hidden repair family, it supplies the missing feature that closes the repair-before-veto loop.

Interactive driving exposes a failure mode that is easy to miss in rule-aware autonomous-driving stacks: a hard-rule margin can be negative for an ego candidate even though a small lawful accommodation by a non-priority agent would restore feasibility. Existing rulebooks, shields, and reachability filters are strong at vetoing unsafe actions, while prediction-based planners model likely responses. Neither returns a runtime proof object that states which bounded multi-agent edit repairs the maneuver, who owns the edit, whether the request is right-of-way affordable, and what ego fallback remains if the request is not observed. We formulate this missing object as interactive repair certification and introduce CARVE, a prediction-free certificate layer over a finite lattice of ego-owned and agent-owned tactical operators. Agent-owned requests are admissible only inside $B_j(s) = β(π_j)α_j^{\max}(s)$, a cooperation envelope that separates kinematic reachability from normative priority. The resulting certificate records the binding rule, repair category, repair set, responsibility-weighted cost split, and fallback. On 589 Lanelet2-geometry-grounded INTERACTION replay episodes, CARVE-Greedy accepts 98.64% of initially vetoed maneuvers and recovers 370/378 human-resolved false vetoes, while preserving 589/589 right-of-way respect, zero priority-agent false positives, and 400/400 negative-stress vetoes. We prove certificate soundness, structural right-of-way respect, exact finite-lattice minimality, fallback contingency, and blame-consistency conditions. CARVE does not predict or require another driver's compliance; it certifies whether a proposed interaction is bounded, attributable, and normatively admissible under declared assumptions.

Multi-turn dialogues let users revoke constraints as easily as impose them, but revocation does not reliably take effect: models keep enacting withdrawn requirements (occasionally beneath comments asserting their removal), a failure we call \emph{behavioral relapse}, or revocation inertia. No existing instrument measures this influence per clause, predicts it before delivery, or repairs it under matched budgets. \sysname{} closes the three gaps through the model API alone: a contract ledger pairs every constraint with an executable checker, records revocations as tombstones, and compiles the net constraint state ahead of time into a single specification; a sequential ablation probe measures per-clause adherence and incremental behavioral effect; a repair ladder operates under token- and attempt-matched budgets. On \dataname{} (\NTasks{} HumanEval tasks, \NClauses{} verified checkers), relapse at an 8B operating point climbs from \ScaleDelayedMTwo{} to \ScaleDelayedMEight{} as constraint load grows, while stronger models sit at floor. Under matched checkers, model, and budget, ahead-of-time compilation significantly reduces relapse against a no-ledger verifier-retry baseline (\RestoreDiff{}, 95% CI \RestoreDiffCI{}, $p$ \RestoreDiffP{}); adaptive ladder interventions stacked on top add no detectable gain (95% confidence excludes gains $\geq$ \LadderExcludedGain{}). The probe predicts relapse before delivery (AUROC \AurocPrimary{}); a one-sentence tombstone note recovers about a third of the compilation effect and survives a placebo control. At \CostDeliveryFactor{} delivery overhead and \CostTotalHedged{} of API compute for every result, revocation failure becomes a measurable, predictable, and repairable property of dialogue state rather than an invisible one.