Adaptive Patching Is Harder Than It Looks For Time-Series Forecasting
Authors: Federico Zucchi, Yi Xie, Chao Zhang, Keyuan Luo, Thomas Lampert, Ziyue Li
Abstract
Adaptive patching is a recent and compelling proposal for time-series Transformers: allocate finer patches where the sequence looks locally informative. This paper asks under what conditions a content-adaptive patching operator should outperform a tuned uniform one. Local heterogeneity alone is not enough: under pointwise forecasting losses, a complex-looking region is not automatically one where finer patching reduces the loss. We model patching as a budgeted bitrate allocation and derive an explicit threshold that a dynamic patching rule must satisfy to beat a well-tuned uniform baseline, then bound the achievable improvement both locally (a quadratic surrogate) and globally (a strong-convexity bound under the model's assumptions). Two structural results follow: without a coupling constraint, scalar local complexity cannot produce a non-uniform optimum under a common loss landscape; and once the backbone is trained to its representation-aware optimum, the alignment gain collapses around a well-tuned uniform patch size. To test these predictions, we run a controlled isolation study on three representative architectures, replacing each adaptive mechanism with a uniform patch-size sweep while keeping the backbone, data, and training protocol fixed. On standard long-horizon forecasting benchmarks, the validation-selected uniform baseline is competitive with the dynamic counterpart, with per-setting effects concentrated near zero and no consistent directional advantage once results are aggregated by dataset. The larger gains we do observe are method- and dataset-specific. Adaptive patching should therefore be evaluated against a tuned uniform baseline; its value depends on whether a cheap and reliable routing signal can identify where finer patches actually reduce forecasting loss.
We study the adaptation of pretrained language models to univariate time-series forecasting through a parameter-efficient transfer learning framework, with the goal of understanding which design choices drive effective cross-modal transfer. While language models operate on discrete textual tokens, time series consist of continuous numerical observations with temporal dependencies. To bridge this modality gap, we project fixed-length time-series patches directly into the embedding space of a pretrained GPT-2 backbone, bypassing textual tokenization and treating the Transformer as a generic sequence encoder. Through controlled ablation studies on seven benchmark datasets spanning energy, weather, traffic, and finance, we analyze the effects of (i)~representation strategy (continuous embeddings versus textual serialisation), (ii)~adaptation regime (frozen backbone versus partial or full fine-tuning), (iii)~architectural components such as adapters, pooling strategies, and prediction heads, and (iv)~input context length. Continuous patch-based embeddings consistently outperform textual prompting and randomly initialised backbones. The adapted pipeline attains MASE within the range of specialised forecasting architectures while updating less than 1% of total model parameters. Results further indicate that freezing the pretrained backbone and training lightweight projection and adapter modules provides a favourable accuracy--efficiency trade-off with stable behaviour across varying context lengths.
Time series forecasting serves as an essential tool for many real-world applications, supporting tasks such as resource optimization and decision-making. Despite significant architectural advancements, most modern models still treat forecasting task as a fixed mapping from history to target horizons. This induces temporal decoupling across future time points and limits the model's ability to adapt to the evolving context as forecasting progresses. In this work, we present LeapTS, a novel framework that reformulates time series forecasting as a dynamic scheduling process over the prediction horizon. Specifically, LeapTS organizes the forecasting process into multi-level decisions using: (1) the hierarchical controller to dynamically select the optimal prediction scale and advancement length at each step, and (2) continuous-time state evolution driven by neural controlled differential equations. Within this process, the controlled update mechanism explicitly couples the irregular temporal dynamics with discrete scheduling feedback. Extensive evaluations on both real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that LeapTS improves overall forecasting performance by at least 7.4% while achieving a 2.6× to 5.3× inference speedup over representative Transformer-based models. Furthermore, by explicitly tracing the scheduling trajectories, we reveal how the model autonomously adapts its forecasting behavior to capture non-stationary dynamics.
Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) aims to improve time series forecasting under distribution shifts by using limited observations revealed during inference. However, forecasting TTA must operate in a source-free online setting, where the adaptation signal is short, temporally correlated, and potentially noisy. Existing methods can therefore suffer from weak identifiability, error accumulation, and unstable long-horizon corrections when the revealed prefix is sparse or contaminated. To address these issues, we propose STEPS, a Smooth Temporal Error Propagation Solver for TTA in time-series forecasting. STEPS reformulates forecasting TTA as a Dirichlet Boundary Value Problem on a temporal manifold, where the revealed prefix error serves as the boundary condition for the unknown future error field. Then, STEPS solves a smooth and bounded correction field in prediction space: a Local Solver propagates prefix errors under temporal smoothness, a Global Solver retrieves stable cross-window error memory and Spatiotemporal Manifold Fusion (SMF) integrates both solutions into the final correction. Across six standard benchmarks and four frozen backbones, STEPS achieves an average relative MSE reduction of 26.82% over the zero-shot backbone, exceeding the strongest compared TTA baseline by 12.77%. Additional sparse prefix and contamination tests confirm the robustness of STEPS under limited and noisy prefixes.